Understanding student preferences for one to one writing appointments post-pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.871Keywords:
pandemic, COVID-19, academic writing, near peer, academic skills, one to one supportAbstract
The academic writing scheme at the university is a near-peer service, which provides students with the opportunity to book one to one appointments with an academic writing tutor. All academic writing tutors are currently studying for their PhD and offer support to students with planning assignments, being critical, structuring their writing, understanding tutor feedback and referencing. When launched in 2019, all appointments took place in-person in the university library. When Covid-19 hit in March 2020, the service moved online, with appointments taking place over Microsoft Teams. However, with this, we noticed a drop in appointment bookings.
Within this study, an online survey was conducted, and the 701 responses analysed to investigate students’ preferences in relation to the delivery of one to one writing appointments post-pandemic. The results indicated a preference for in-person appointments to be available, with 55.8% of the respondents choosing this. The main factor was the preference for communicating in-person as it allows for more questions and a natural conversation.
However, there is clearly still an appetite for appointments to be delivered online, with postgraduate students in particular expressing an interest in this format. Students indicated that the accessibility of appointments for students who are not on campus regularly as the biggest factor for choosing online as their preference.
It can be concluded that a hybrid model, where students can choose between the two appointment types is most appropriate, which along with increased targeted promotion to specific faculties and year groups, should increase the usage of the service.
References
Alsaaty, F. M., Carter, E., Abrahams, D. and Alshameri, F. (2016) ‘Traditional versus online learning in institutions of higher education: minority business students’ perceptions’, Business and Management Research, 5(2), pp.31-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v5n2p31.
Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H. and Pekrun, R. (2015) ‘Students’ emotions for achievement and technology use in synchronous hybrid graduate programmes: a control-value approach’, Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26097.
Capous-Desyllas, M., Bromfield, N. F., Nava, A. and Barnes, B. (2021) ‘Teaching note—strategies for enhancing writing among first-generation social work students: reflections on the use of peer writing mentors, Journal of Social Work Education, 57(1), pp.189-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2020.1798314.
Eringfeld, S. (2021) 'Higher education and its post-coronial future: utopian hopes and dystopian fears at Cambridge university during Covid-19', Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), pp.146-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859681.
Gilbert, B. (2015) Online learning revealing the benefits and challenges. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1304&context=education_ETD_masters (Accessed: 25 January 2022).
Gopee, N. and Deane, M. (2013) ‘Strategies for successful academic writing—institutional and non-institutional support for students’, Nurse Education Today, 33(12), pp.1624-1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004.
Hill, K. and Fitzgerald, R. (2020) ‘Student perspectives of the impact of COVID-19 on learning’, All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 12(2), pp.1-9.
Jaggars, S. S. (2014) ‘Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: community college student voices’, American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), pp.27-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697.
Kanwar, A. and Carr, A. (2020) 'The impact of Covid-19 on international higher education: new models for the new normal', Journal of Learning for Development, 7(3), pp.326-333.
Kotula, J. and Beaumont, K. (2021) ‘We’re all in the same boat: humanising teaching and learning experiences as a way to achieve engaging and interactive online provision’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Issue 22, October, pp.1-6. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi22.755.
Lederer, A. M., Hoban, M. T., Lipson, S. K., Zhou, S. and Eisenberg, D. (2020) ‘More than inconvenienced: the unique needs of US college students during the Covid-19
pandemic’, Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), pp.14-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120969372.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. and Baki, M. (2013) ‘The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature’, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(3), pp.1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307.
Oswal, S. K. and Meloncon, L. (2014) ‘Paying attention to accessibility when designing online courses in technical and professional communication’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(3), pp.271-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651914524780.
Pownall, M., Harris, R. and Blundell-Birtill, P. (2021) ‘Supporting students during the transition to university in COVID-19: 5 key considerations and recommendations for educators’, PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4fykt.
Public Agenda (2013) Not yet sold: what employers and community college students think about online education. Available at https://publicagenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Not-Yet-Sold-2013.pdf (Accessed: 25 January 2022).
Raaper, R. and Brown, C. (2020) ‘The Covid-19 pandemic and the dissolution of the university campus: implications for student support practice’, Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4) pp.343-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0032.
Ramachandran, R. and Rodriguez, M. C. (2020) ‘Student perspectives on remote learning in a large organic chemistry lecture course’, Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), pp.2565-2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572.
Rienties, B. and Toetenel, L. (2016) ‘The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: a cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules’, Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp.333-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.074.
Stern, B. S. (2004) ‘A comparison of online and face-to-face instruction in an undergraduate foundations of American education course’, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(2), pp.196-213.
Tagoe, M. (2012) ‘Students’ perceptions on incorporating e-learning into teaching and learning at the University of Ghana’, International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), pp.91-103.
Tratnik, A., Urh, M. and Jereb, E. (2019) ‘Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education context’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), pp.36-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1374875.
Universities U.K. (2020) Achieving stability in the higher education sector following COVID-19. Available at: https://universitiesuk.ac.uk/news/Documents/uuk_achieving-stability-higher-education-april-2020.pdf (Accessed: 1 July 2021).
Vallis, C. (2021) ‘Designing workshops to be sociable rather than remote’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Issue 22, October, pp.1-5. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi22.722.
Xu, D. and Jaggars, S. S. (2014) ‘Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: differences across types of students and academic subject areas’, The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), pp.633-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777343.
Yomtov, D., Plunkett, S., Efrat, R. and Marin, A. (2017) ‘Can peer mentors improve first-year experiences of university students?’ Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(1), pp.25-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
