‘It can facilitate so much!’ Student writers’ practice of self-efficacy to develop their use of formulaic phrases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.856Keywords:
formulaic phrases, student writers, self-efficacy, specific learning difficulty, SpLDAbstract
This study is about student writers’ development of their own approaches to using formulaic phrases from a compendium (Academic Phrasebank). While the essential role of formulaic phrases in academic texts has been well-established in research, teaching about the effective use of these phrases is not widely available, and little attention has been paid to how students learn to employ formulaic phrases in their own writing. Therefore, this research aims to explore this gap in understanding how student writers develop individual approaches to using formulaic phrases through the lens of self-efficacy.
Twelve self-selected student writer participants at undergraduate, Master’s and PhD levels were interviewed and asked about how they used formulaic phrases from the resource. Three key findings emerged from the data: firstly, that the resource may support inclusion as an empowering tool to enable student writers to participate confidently in academia; secondly, that students could employ the resource flexibly at different stages of the writing process depending on their individual approach to text construction; thirdly, that it could offer particular support with writing to students who have a specific learning difficulty (SpLD).
This paper contributes to understanding these individual student learning processes in the use of formulaic phrases for writing through self-efficacy. The implication for learning development is that making more guidance about formulaic phrases widely available and accessible would be beneficial to students’ writing processes.
References
Abegglen, S., Burns, T. and Sinfield, S. (2019) ‘It’s learning development, Jim – but not as we know it: academic literacies in third space’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15, November. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.500 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Baddeley, A. (2000) ‘The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?’ Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, pp.417–423. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Barks, D. and Watts, P. (2001) ‘Textual borrowing strategies for graduate ESL writers’, in Belcher, D. and Hirvela, A. (eds.) Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp.246-267.
Biber, D. (2006) University language: a corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1994) ‘Introduction: language and the relationship to language in the teaching situation’, in Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. and de Saint Martin, M. (eds.), Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-34.
Davis, M. and Morley, J. (2018) ‘Facilitating learning about academic phraseology’, Journal of Learning Development in HE, Special Edition ALDinHE Conference 2018, pp.1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.468 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Davis, M. and Morley, J. (2015) ‘Phrasal intertextuality: the responses of academics from different disciplines to students’ re-use of phrases from sources in their writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, pp.20-35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Forster, E. (2020) ‘Power and paragraphs: academic writing and emotion’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi19.610 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
French, A. (2018) ‘Academic writing: anxiety, confusion and the affective domain: why should subject lecturers acknowledge the social and emotional aspects of writing development processes’, Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), pp.202-211. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v8i2.487 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Graham, S., Fishman, E., Reid, R. and Hebert, M. (2016) ‘Writing Characteristics of Students with Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis Learning Disabilities’, Research and Practice, 31(2), pp.75–89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12099 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
HESA (2021) Higher education student statistics: UK, 2019/20 - student numbers and characteristics. Available at https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/27-01-2021/sb258-higher-education-student-statistics/numbers (Accessed: 5 November 2021).
Hyland, K. (2008) ‘Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), pp.41-62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Martinussen, R. and Major, A (2011) ‘Working Memory Weaknesses in Students With ADHD: Implications for Instruction’, Theory Into Practice 50 (1), pp.68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534943 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E. and Lobchuk, M. M. (2019) ‘Applying the “social turn” in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.512 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Morley, J. (2005) Academic Phrasebank. Available at https://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/ (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Mortimore, T. and Crozier, W. R. (2006) ‘Dyslexia and difficulties with study skills in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 31, pp.235–251. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572173 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Murray, R. and Moore, S. (2006) A handbook of academic writing. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Shanahan, T. (2016) ‘Relationships between reading and writing development’, in MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S. and Fitzgerald, J. (eds.) Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford Press, pp.194-207.
Shapiro, S. (2020) ‘Inclusive pedagogy in the academic writing classroom: cultivating communities of belonging’, Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), pp.154-164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.607 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Sumner, E. and Connelly, V. (2020) ‘Writing and revision strategies of students with and without dyslexia’, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(3), pp.189–198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419899090 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Swales, J. (1981) Aspects of article introductions (Aston ESP Research Report No.1). Birmingham: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.
Thies, L. C. and Rosario, V. (2019) ‘Partners in a changing dance: embedding academic literacies in unit and course curricula’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.538 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Wingate, U. (2015) Academic literacy and student diversity: the case for inclusive practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093496
Wingate, U. (2019) ‘Achieving transformation through collaboration: the role of academic literacies’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.566 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).