Between the office and the coffee shop: an examination of spaces used for research degree supervision
Keywords:doctoral supervision, research degrees, power, pedagogy, location, space
The last two decades have seen increased attention given to the role of space within the university campus, with numerous new learning spaces forming part of both the physical and the digital campus. Much of the focus of how these spaces work to create supportive learning environments has been on undergraduate teaching. However, these spaces offer a great opportunity to also enhance the doctoral researcher’s supervision process through the creation of new learning spaces that break away from the traditional office setting. In taking the coffee shop as the antithesis of the office, this paper examines theories around space-making in relation to doctoral research, adding in the experiences of UK doctoral researchers to provoke further thought and discussion about how new spaces within a university and outside the campus might be considered part of the pedagogical approach to supervision. Results suggest that although there is much to be considered, doctoral researchers spend the majority of their time in traditional spaces—where they feel the most comfortable—and become progressively less comfortable the further supervision moves towards public spaces.
Al Makhamreh, M. and Stockley, D. (2019) ‘Mentorship and well-being: examining doctoral students’ lived experiences in doctoral supervision context’, International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), pp.1-20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0013 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Campbell, T. and Campbell, D. (1997) ‘Faculty/student mentoring program: effects on academic performance and retention’, Research in Higher Education, 38(6), pp.727-742. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024911904627 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Conrad, L. (2017) ‘Gender and postgraduate supervision’, in Zuber-Skerritt, O. and Ryan, Y. (eds.) Quality in Postgraduate Education. Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 51-58 Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315799889-6 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Deed, C. and Alterator, S. (2017) ‘Informal learning spaces and their impact on learning in tertiary education: framing new narratives of participation’, Journal of Learning Spaces 6(3). Available at: http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/viewFile/1439/1165 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Eby, L.T., Allen, T.D., Evans, S.C., Ng, T. and DuBois, D.L. (2008) ‘Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals’, Journal of Vocational Behaviour ,72(2), pp.254-267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Ellis, R.A. and Goodyear, P. (2016) ‘Models of learning space: integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education’, Review of Education, 4(2), pp.149-191. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3056 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Else, H. (2017) ‘UK universities’ estate spending tops £3 billion for first time’, Times Higher Education, 6 October, Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/uk-universities-estate-spending-tops-ps3-billion-first-time (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Fassinger, P.A. (1995) ‘Understanding classroom interaction: students’ and professors’ contributions to students’ silence’, The Journal of Higher Education, 66(1), pp.82-96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1995.11774758 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Firth, A. and Martens, E. (2008) ‘Transforming supervisors? A critique of post-liberal approaches to research supervision’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), pp.279-289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802045303 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Garvey, B. and Alred, G. (2000) ‘Educating mentors,’ Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 8(2), pp.113-126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/713685525 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Garvis, S. and Pendergast, D. (2012) ‘The importance of supervision in higher education: key lessons learnt from a relational approach’, in Garvis, S. and Dwyer, R. (eds.) Whisperings from the Corridors. Leiden, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp.25-34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-164-1_3 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Gaston, A. and Duschinsky, R. (2020) ‘Students’ experiences of the Cambridge supervision system: performance, pedagogy and power’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(8), pp.1218-1234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1806038 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Goffman, E. (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. 4th edn. London: Penguin Books.
Grant, B.M. (2005) ‘Fighting for space in supervision: fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), pp.337-354. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Halse, C. (2011) ‘“Becoming a supervisor”: the impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning’, Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), pp.557-570. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Hemer, S.R. (2012) ‘Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: supervising PhD candidates over coffee’, Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), pp.827-839. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.674011 (Accessed: 18 February 2022).
Hockey, J. (1994) ‘Establishing boundaries: problems and solutions in managing PhD supervisors’ role’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), pp.293-305. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764940240211 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Hockey, J. (1995) ‘Getting too close: a problem and a possible solution in social science PhD supervision’, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23(2), pp.199-210. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889508253005 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Holley, L.C. and Steiner, S. (2005) ‘Safe space: student perspectives on classroom environment’, Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), pp.49-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300343 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Kiley, M. and Halliday, D.P. (2019) ‘Candidate and supervisor experiences of doctoral study in a structured, interdisciplinary training environment’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), pp.663-674. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1570306 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Latting, J.K. (1990) ‘Identifying the “isms”: enabling social work students to confront their biases’, Journal of Social Work Education, 26(1), pp.36-44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1990.10672132 (Accessed: 22 February 2022).
Lefebvre, H. (1991) The production of space. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Leung, M. and Bush, T. (2003) ‘Student mentoring in higher education: Hong Kong Baptist University’, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 11(3), pp.263-271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126032000138319 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Madikizela-Madiya, N. and Atwebembeire, J. M. (2020) ‘“Colleague postgraduate supervision” and the production of space in higher education: a duoethnographic analysis’, Qualitative Research Journal, 21(2), pp.166-176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-05-2020-0039 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Manathunga, C. (2005) ‘The development of research supervision: “turning the light on a private space”’, International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1), pp.17-30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440500099977 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Manathunga, C. (2007) ‘Supervision as mentoring: the role of power and boundary crossing’, Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), pp.207-221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370701424650 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Manathunga, C. (2009) ‘Supervision as a contested space: a response’, Teaching in Higher Education, 14 (3), pp.341-345. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902990242 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Maor, D., Ensor, J.D. and Fraser, B.J. (2016) ‘Doctoral supervision in virtual spaces: a review of research of web-based tools to develop collaborative supervision’, Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), pp.172-188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Massey, D. (2008) For space. London: Sage.
Maxwell, T.W. and Smyth, R. (2011) ‘Higher degree research supervision: from practice toward theory’, Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), pp.219-231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.509762 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Morieson, L., Murray, G., Wilson, R., Clarke, B. and Lukas, K. (2018) ‘Belonging in space: informal learning spaces and the student experience’, Journal of Learning Spaces 7(2). Available at: http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1667 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Murphy, M.J. and Wright, D.W. (2005) ‘Supervisees' perspectives of power use in supervision’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(3), pp.283-295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01569.x (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Oldenburg, R. (1989) The great good place: cafes, coffee shops, community centres, beauty parlours, general stores, bars, hangouts and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House.
Olmos-López, P. and Sunderland, J. (2017) ‘Doctoral supervisors' and supervisees' responses to co-supervision’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), pp.727-740. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D. and McAlpine, L. (2011) ‘Knowledge and identity work in the supervision of doctoral student writing: shaping rhetorical subjects’, in Starke-Meyerring, D., Paré, A., Artemeva, N., Horne, M. and Yousoubova, L. (eds.) Writing in knowledge societies. Fort Collins: WAC Clearinghouse, pp.215-236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2011.2379.2.11 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, D. and Tibbetts, B. (2008) ‘Designing next generation places of learning: collaboration at the pedagogy-space-technology nexus’, ALTC Priority Project #627. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Available at: https://ltr.edu.au/resources/grants_pp_projectreport_nextgeneration_uq_jan09.pdf (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Redmond, S.P. (1990) ‘Mentoring and cultural diversity in academic settings’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 34(2), p.188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764290034002007 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Robertson, M. (2017) ‘Aspects of mentorship in team supervision of doctoral students in Australia’, The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4), pp.409-424. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0241-z (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Simpson, R. (1983) How the PhD came to Britain A Century of Struggle for Postgraduate Education. Society for Research into Higher Education, Monograph 54.
Soja, E.W. (1980) ‘The socio-spatial dialectic’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), pp.207-225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Strandler, O., Johansson, T., Wisker, G. and Claesson, S. (2014) ‘Supervisor or counsellor? Emotional boundary work in supervision’, International Journal for Researcher Development, 5(2), pp.70-82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-03-2014-0002 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Taylor, S. (2020) The research supervisor’s bibliography. UK Council for Graduate Education. Available at: https://cpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/dist/8/5425/files/2017/09/Research-Supervisors-Bibliography-UKCGE-Resource.pdf (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Terrion, J.L. and Leonard, D. (2007) ‘A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: findings from a literature review’, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(2), pp.149-164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086311 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Vaatstra, R. and De Vries, R. (2007) ‘The effect of the learning environment on competences and training for the workplace according to graduates’, Higher Education, 53(3), pp.335-357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-2413-4 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
Watts, J.H. (2010) ‘Team supervision of the doctorate: managing roles, relationships and contradictions’, Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), pp.335-339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003740908 (Accessed: 21 February 2022).
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).