Why is research still invisible in further education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i6.206Keywords:
Research, Further Education, Lecturer, Tutor, CultureAbstract
This article takes as its starting point earlier research reported by Geoffrey Elliott in 1996. That study found that research was consistantly marginalised in the FE sector, and identified a number of structural factors that contributed to this ââ¬Ëinvisibilityââ¬â¢. This new study draws upon a small sample of lecturers who belong to a Further and Higher Education Early Years Partnership. Through the participantsââ¬â¢ voices and perspectives, the authors identify continuing dissonance and issues of research marginalisation. The discussion also highlights contemporary educational discourse, with its predominant focus upon measurable value at the expense of values, as a key factor in sustaining a culture that is antithetic to thoughtful reflection and research. The authors identify the development of a ââ¬Ëcollaborative centralisedââ¬â¢ research community as critical to an alternative possibility for research in further education.Downloads
Published
02-12-2013
How to Cite
Solvason, C. and Elliott, G. (2013) “Why is research still invisible in further education”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (6). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.v0i6.206.
Issue
Section
Papers
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).