Research process model for bachelor's thesis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1379

Keywords:

thesis writing, undergraduate, guidance, research, methodology

Abstract

This is an exploration of challenges faced by bachelor’s students during the thesis-writing process and the development of a model to simplify and visualise this research journey. Drawing from literature and insights gained through supervision observations and interviews, the model addresses common challenges such as topic selection, methodological clarity, and adherence to academic standards. It offers an outlined approach, first focusing on research proposal development and then progressing to the full project, covering key elements such as the literature review, problem definition, research questions, methodology, and ethical considerations. By providing a clear, step-by-step guide, the model enhances student understanding and fosters academic independence, offering practical support for both students and supervisors.

Author Biography

Björn Praestegaard Larsen, Jönköping University

Björn Praestegaard Larsen is a lecturer at the School of Engineering, Jönköping University, where he specializes in pedagogical leadership, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity. With an MSc in Informatics his academic focus lies in the intersection of sociotechnical systems, privacy, and cyber resilience. Björn has extensive experience in teaching, course development, and conducting faculty training for colleagues, particularly within pedagogical professionalism and active learning methodologies. He is an advocate for student-centred learning and has received recognition for his contributions to higher education, including a pedagogical excellence award. His research interests are within the sociotechnical and security challenges of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS), focusing on the interplay between technology, human factors, and cybersecurity. His work explores how AI-driven decision systems and automated security frameworks can enhance autonomy while ensuring transparency, fairness, and privacy. With expertise in cyber resilience, risk management, and critical infrastructure security, he integrates technical, ethical, and social dimensions to develop secure and sustainable autonomous maritime systems.

References

Adams, W.C. (2015) ‘Conducting semi-structured interviews’, in K.E. Newcomer, H.P. Hatry and J.S. Wholey (eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, pp.492-505. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch1

Ädel, A., Skogs, J., Lindgren, C. and Stridfeldt, M. (2023) ‘The supervisor and student in bachelor thesis supervision: a broad repertoire of sometimes conflicting roles’, European Journal of Higher Education, 14(2), pp.207-227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2162560

Agricola, B.T., Prins, F.J., van der Schaaf, M.F., and van Tartwijk, J. (2021) ’Supervisor and student perspectives on undergraduate thesis supervision in higher education’ Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), pp.877-897. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1775115

All European Academies [ALLEA] (2023) European Code of Conduct for research integrity. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26356/ECOC

Ayo, Y. (2010) ‘Addressing issues of race and culture in supervision’, in C. Burck and G. Daniel (eds) Mirrors and Reflections, New York: Routledge, pp.225-248.

Baglione, L.A. (2021) ‘Empowering students by teaching research-paper writing as a foundational methods course’, in D.J. Mallinson, J. Marin Hellwege and E.D. Loepp (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Political Research Pedagogy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.389–399. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76955-0_33

Bazrafkan, L., Yousefy, A., Amini, M. and Yamani, N. (2019) ‘The journey of thesis supervisors from novice to expert: a grounded theory study’, BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1739-z

Benavente, A.R., De Asis, B.M.R., Adora, J.P., Malapascua, J.B., Esguerra, J.O. and Ilagan, J.J.B. (2022) ‘Students’ challenges on writing undergraduate thesis in the College of Business, Administration and Accountancy at Laguna University: basis for research programs’, International Journal of Education, Teaching, and Social Science, 2(4), pp.128-141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47747/ijets.v2i4.791

Booth, A., Martyn-St James, M., Clowes, M. and Sutton, A. (2021) Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 3rd edn. London: SAGE.

Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., Williams, J.M., Bizup, J. and FitzGerald, W.T. (2024) The Craft of Research. 5th edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brooke, M. (2017) ‘Using ‘semantic waves’ to guide students through the research process: from adopting a stance to sound cohesive academic writing’, Asian Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), pp.37-66. Publisher: National University of Singapore. Available at: https://nus.edu.sg/cdtl/engagement/publications/ajsotl-home/asian-journal-of-the-scholarship-of-teaching-and-learning (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

‘Council regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data’ (2016) Official Journal L119. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2022) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 6th edn. Los Angeles, California: SAGE.

Davidavičienė, V. (2018) ‘Research methodology: an introduction’, in J. Marx Gómez and S. Mouselli (eds) Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment: Methodologies and Cases in Business Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.1-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_1

Davidson, J.E. and Sternberg, R.J. (eds) (2003) The Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615771

de Grave, W., Zanting, A., Mansvelder-Longayroux, D.D. and Molenaar, W.M. (2014) ‘Workshops and seminars: enhancing effectiveness’, in Y. Steinert (ed) Faculty Development in the Health Professions: A Focus on Research and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.181-195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7612-8_9

Denney, A.S. and Tewksbury, R. (2013) ‘How to write a literature review’, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), pp.218-234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.730617

Douglas, H. (2022) ‘Sampling techniques for qualitative research’, in M.R. Islam, N.A. Khan and R. Baikady (eds) Principles of Social Research Methodology. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp.415-426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_29

Elliott, V. (2018) ‘Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis’, The Qualitative Report, 23(11), pp.2850-2861. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560

Ellis, T. J. and Levy, Y. (2008) ‘Framework of problem-based research: a guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem’, Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 11(7), pp.17-33. Available at: http://doi.org/10.28945/438

Fields, X. and Wotipka, C.M. (2022) ‘Effect of LGBT anti-discrimination laws on school climate and outcomes for lesbian, gay, and bisexual high school students’, Journal of LGBT Youth, 19(3), pp.307-329. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2020.1821276

Fleming, R.S. and Kowalsky, M. (2021a) ‘The importance of effective time management’, in R.S. Fleming and M. Kowalsky (eds) Survival Skills for Thesis and Dissertation Candidates, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.11-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80939-3_3

Fleming, R.S. and Kowalsky, M. (2021b) ‘Understanding why candidates fail to complete their thesis or dissertation’, in R.S. Fleming and M. Kowalsky (eds) Survival Skills for Thesis and Dissertation Candidates, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.37-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80939-3_8

Freeman, M. (2008) ‘Hermeneutics’, in L.M. Given (ed) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp.386-388. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n194

Gordon, S.P. (2022) ‘Integrating the experiential learning cycle with educational supervision’, Journal of Educational Supervision, 5(3), pp.1-34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.5.3.1

Hamburg, I. and Grosch, K.R. (2017) ‘Ethical aspects in cyber security’, Archives of Business Research, 5(10), pp.199-206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.510.3818

Hammersley, M. (2023) Methodological Concepts: A Critical Guide. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003350354

Hart, E.K. and Annear, C.M. (2020) ‘Research coherence: a framework for successful student research’, College Teaching, 68(3), pp.112-123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1758022

Heck, T., Keller, C. and Rittberger, M. (2023) ‘Coverage and similarity of bibliographic databases to find most relevant literature for systematic reviews in education’, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 25, pp.365-376. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-023-00364-3

Hevner, A. and Chatterjee, S. (2010) Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. New York: Springer Nature. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8

Hevner, A.R. and Gregor, S. (2013) ‘Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact’, MIS Quarterly, 37(2), pp.337-355. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825912 (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

Hollis, L.P. (2017) ‘The need for anti-bullying policies on campus: an argument for improving gender and race relations in higher education’, Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships, 3(3), pp.29-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2017.0002

Houston, G. (2024) ‘Maintaining motivation through the middle stages: overcoming challenges, supporting progress, academic writing and feedback, in K. Clegg, G. Houston and O. Gower, Doctoral Supervision and Research Culture. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp.112-136. Available at: https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781003248118-11

Howard, E. (2018) ‘EU anti-discrimination law: has the CJEU stopped moving forward?’, International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 18(2-3), pp.60-81. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/1358229118788454

Imel, S. (2011) ‘Writing a literature review’, in T.S. Rocco and T. Hatcher (eds) The Handbook of Scholarly Writing and Publishing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.145-160.

Jagadeesh, G., Balakumar, P., and Senatore, F. (2023) ‘The roadmap to research: fundamentals of a multifaceted research process’, in G. Jagadeesh, P. Balakumar and F. Senatore (eds) The Quintessence of Basic and Clinical Research and Scientific Publishing. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp.3-20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1284-1_1

Jaldemark, J. and Lindberg, J.O. (2013) ‘Technology-mediated supervision of undergraduate students’ dissertations’, Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), pp.1382-1392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.626851

Jalongo, M.R. (2023) ‘Choosing a topic: focus and title’, in M.R. Jalongo and O.N. Saracho (eds) Scholarly Writing: Publishing Manuscripts That Are Read, Downloaded, and Cited, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.91-114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_5

Jordal, M., Eriksson, H., Salzmann-Erikson, M. and Mazaheri, M. (2021) ‘Escorting students into responsibility and autonomy (ESRA): a model for supervising degree projects’, Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, pp.1165-1173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S307169

Jusslin, S. and Hilli, C. (2024) ‘Supporting bachelor’s and master’s students’ thesis writing: a rhizoanalysis of academic writing workshops in hybrid learning spaces’, Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), pp.712-729. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2250809

Jusslin, S. and Widlund, A. (2024) ‘Academic writing workshop-ing to support students writing bachelor’s and master’s theses: a more-than-human approach’, Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), pp.233-250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973409

Karunaratne, T. (2018) ‘Blended supervision for thesis projects in higher education: a case study’, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(2), pp.79-90. Available at: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1859 (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

Kenneally, E. and Dittrich, D. (2012) The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2445102

Keshav, S. (2007) ‘How to read a paper’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(3), pp.83-84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1273445.1273458

Kiger, M.E. and Varpio, L. (2020) ‘Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no. 131’, Medical Teacher, 42(8), pp.846-854. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Kopzhassarova, U., Akbayeva, G., Eskazinova, Z., Belgibayeva, G., and Tazhikeyeva, A. (2016) ‘Enhancement of students’ independent learning through their critical thinking skills development’, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), pp.11585-11592. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1121248 (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

Kretser, A., Murphy, D., Bertuzzi, S., Abraham, T., Allison, D.B., Boor, K.J., Dwyer, J., Grantham, A., et al. (2019) ‘Scientific integrity principles and best practices: recommendations from a scientific integrity consortium’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, pp.327-355. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3

Lee, A. (2019) Successful Research Supervision: Advising students doing research. 2nd edn. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351234986

Lewis, S. (2015) ‘Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches’, Health Promotion Practice, 16(4), pp.473-475. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941

Loi, M. and Christen, M. (2020) ‘Ethical frameworks for cybersecurity’, in M. Christen, B. Gordijn and M. Loi (eds) The Ethics of Cybersecurity. Zürich: Springer International Publishing, pp.73-95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29053-5_4

Magaldi, D. and Berler, M. (2020) ‘Semi-structured interviews’, in V. Zeigler-Hill and T.K. Shackelford (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences’. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.4825-4830. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_857

Mantzoukas, S. (2008) ‘Facilitating research students in formulating qualitative research questions’, Nurse Education Today, 28(3), pp.371-377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.06.012

Maxwell, J.A. (2009) ‘Designing a qualitative study’, in L. Bickman and D.J. Rog (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp.214-253. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7

Maxwell, J.A. (2012) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, San Francisco: SAGE.

Mayyas, F. and Alzoubi, K. (2022) ‘Awareness and knowledge of manuscript writing and research integrity: a cross sectional survey among graduate students’, Heliyon, 8(11), e11447. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11447

Meeus, W., Van Looy, L., and Libotton, A. (2004) ‘The bachelor’s thesis in teacher education’, European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(3), pp.299-321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976042000290813

Mhunpiew, N. (2013) ‘A supervisor’s roles for successful thesis and dissertation’, US-China Education Review A, 3(2), pp.119-122. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540484 (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldãna, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

Ng, E. and Stephenson, J. (2016) ‘Individuals, teams, and organizational benefits of managing diversity: an evidence-based perspective’, in R. Bendl, I. Bleijenbergh, E. Henttonen and A.J. Mills (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Diversity in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.235-254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199679805.013.6

Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006) ‘Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp.199-218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S. (2020) ‘Change and continuity in thesis and dissertation writing: the evolution of an academic genre’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100910

Praestegaard Larsen, B. (2024) ‘A review of ethical considerations within autonomous maritime cybersecurity research’, Journal of Maritime Research, 21(1), pp.97-100. Available at: https://www.jmr.unican.es/index.php/jmr/article/view/771 (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

Recker, J. (2021) Scientific Research in Information Systems: A Beginner’s Guide. 2nd edn. Cham: Springer Nature. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85436-2

Reimann, N., Sadler, I. and Hill, J. (eds) (2025) Academic Standards in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives and Practical Strategies, Abingdon: Oxon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003379768

Roberts, L.D. and Seaman, K. (2018) ‘Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators’, International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), pp.28-40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1412971

Rowley, J. and Slack, F. (2004) ‘Conducting a literature review’, Management Research News, 27(6), pp.31-39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185

Råde, A. (2014) ‘Final thesis models in European teacher education and their orientation towards the academy and the teaching profession’, European Journal of Teacher Education. 37(2), pp.144-155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.858692

Saldãna, J. (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th edn. Los Angeles, California: SAGE.

Salmento, H. and Murtonen, M. (2019) ‘The roles of epistemic understanding and research skills in students’ views of scientific thinking’, in M. Murtonen and K. Balloo (eds) Redefining Scientific Thinking for Higher Education: Higher-Order Thinking, Evidence-Based Reasoning and Research Skills. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.31-57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24215-2_2

Sapsford, R. and Jupp, V. (eds) (2006) Data Collection and Analysis. 2nd edn, London: SAGE. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208802

Sergis, S. and Sampson, D.G. (2017) ‘Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: a systematic literature review’, in A. Peña-Ayala (ed) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends: A View of the Current State of the Art to Enhance e-Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.25-63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_2

Stangebye, H. (2019) A Guide to Research Development. Master’s thesis. Johns Hopkins University. Available at: http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/63863 (Accessed: 14 February 2025).

Stephen, J.S. (2024) ‘Skills and strategies for research and reading’, in J.S. Stephen (ed) Academic Success in Online Programs: A Resource for College Students, Cham: Springer Nature, pp.111-124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54439-2_8

Strebel, F., Gürtler, S., Hulliger, B., and Lindeque, J. (2021) ‘Laissez-faire or guidance? Effective supervision of bachelor theses’, Studies in Higher Education, 46(4), pp.866-884. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1659762

Taub, M., Banzon, A.M., Outerbridge, S., Walker, L.R., Olivera, L., Salas, M. and Schneier, J. (2023) ‘Towards scaffolding self-regulated writing: implications for developing writing interventions in first-year writing’, Metacognition and Learning, 18(3), pp.749-782. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09357-8

Thomas, D.R. (2006) ‘A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data’, American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), pp.237-246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

van de Poel, I. (2020) ‘Core values and value conflicts in cybersecurity: beyond privacy versus security, in M. Christen, B. Gordijn and M. Loi (eds) The Ethics of Cybersecurity. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.45-71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29053-5_3

Vinayavekhin, S. and Phaal, R. (2023) ‘Roadmapping for strategic alignment, integration and synchronization’, in T.U. Daim, R. Phaal, D. Meissner and C. Kerr (eds) Next Generation Roadmapping: Establishing Technology and Innovation Pathways Towards Sustainable Value. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.1-24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38575-9_1

vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A. and Maedch, A. (2020) ‘Introduction to design science research’, in J. vom Brocke, A. Hevner and A. Maedche (eds) Design Science Research. Cases. Cham: Springer Nature, pp.1-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_1

Weber, K. and Kleine, N. (2020) ‘Cybersecurity in health care’, in M. Christen, B. Gordijn and M. Loi (eds) The Ethics of Cybersecurity. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.139-156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29053-5_7

Wisker, G. (2018) ‘Frameworks and freedoms: supervising research learning and the undergraduate dissertation’, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 15(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.4.2

Wisker, G. (2019) ‘Developing scientific thinking and research skills through the research thesis or dissertation’, in M. Murtonen and K. Balloo (eds) Redefining Scientific Thinking for Higher Education: Higher-Order Thinking, Evidence-Based Reasoning and Research Skills. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.203-232. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24215-2_9

Yadav, S.K. (2023) ‘Philosophy of research: an introduction’, in S.K. Yadav (ed) Research and Publication Ethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.1-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26971-4_1

Zheng, H., Herawati, H. and Saneewong, S. (2019) ‘Effective intercultural supervision: using reflective practice to enhance students’ and supervisors’ intercultural competence’, in L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay and B. Cahusac de Caux (eds) Wellbeing in Doctoral Education: Insights and Guidance from the Student Experience, Singapore: Springer Nature, pp.219-228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_18

Zobel, J. (2014) Writing for Computer Science. 3rd edn. London: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6639-9

2022.2162560.

Downloads

Published

28-02-2025

How to Cite

Praestegaard Larsen, B. (2025). Research process model for bachelor’s thesis. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (34). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1379

Issue

No. 34 (2025)

Section

Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).