We need to talk about AL: has academic literacies designed the pedagogy out of Learning Development?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi31.1267Keywords:
academic literacies, pedagogy, social constructivism, critical realismAbstract
Academic literacies (AL) research has made significant contributions to understandings of student writing and literacy across higher education and particularly learning development. However, researchers and practitioners both within and external to the AL movement have struggled to clarify the relationship between AL and pedagogy. English for Academic Purposes researchers have highlighted the lack of a workable AL pedagogy, whilst AL researchers maintain that the model represents a design space or heuristic for thinking about practice in context, rather than a source of pedagogic prescriptions. This theoretical discussion elaborates concerns with the structural coherence of the AL model, its broadly social constructivist underpinnings and evidence base, and the impact of its ideological orientation on the pedagogy we derive from it. Underpinning these critiques is a suspicion that the interpretation of social constructivist epistemology on which AL relies to pinpoint weaknesses in the models of literacy/writing which it subsumes cannot generate a practical pedagogy. We argue that these structural and ideological tensions in the AL model help to explain confusion over its interpretation and implementation. We speculate that this singular focus on social constructivist-derived theory, though well-intentioned, does more to reinforce a particular ideological commitment than to enhance student learning.
References
Badenhorst, C., Moloney, C., Dyer, J., Rosales, J. and Murray, M. (2015) ‘Thinking creatively about research writing’, in T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M.R. Lea and S. Mitchell (eds.) Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press LLC, pp.97−106.
Biesta, G. (2017) ‘Don’t be fooled by ignorant schoolmasters: on the role of the teacher in emancipatory education’, Policy Futures in Education, 15, pp.52−73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316681202
Clarence, S. and McKenna, S. (2017) ‘Developing academic literacies through understanding the nature of disciplinary knowledge’, London Review of Education, 15, pp.38−49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.04
Clughen, L. and Connell, M. (2015) ‘Working with power: a dialogue about writing support using insights from psychotherapy’, in T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M.R. Lea and S. Mitchell (eds.) Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press LLC, pp.45−53.
Fallin, L. (2024) ‘Methodologies for research in learning development’, in A. Syska and C. Buckley (eds.) How to be a learning developer in higher education: critical perspectives, community and practice. London: Routledge, pp.164−174.
Hilsdon, J., Malone, C. and Syska, A. (2019) ‘Academic literacies twenty years on: a community-sourced literature review’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15. pp.1−49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.567
Hirschkop, K. (2021) The Cambridge introduction to Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kotzee, B. (2010) ‘Seven posers in the constructivist classroom’, London Review of Education, 8(2), pp.177−187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2010.487340
Krahenbuhl, K.S. (2016) ‘Student-centered education and constructivism: challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers’, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(3), pp.97−105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lea, M.R. (2004) ‘Academic literacies: a pedagogy for course design’, Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), pp.739−756. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230
Lea, M.R. (2016) ‘Academic literacies: looking back in order to look forward’, Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), pp.88−101. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/cristal/article/view/149790 (Accessed: 30 Aug 2024).
Lea, M.R. (2017) ‘Academic literacies theory and practice’, in B. Street and S. May (eds.) Literacies and language education. Cham: Springer, pp.147−158.
Lea, M.R. and Street, B.V. (1998) ‘Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’, Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), pp.157−172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lillis, T. (2003) ‘Student writing as “academic literacies”: drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design’, Language and Education, 17(3), pp.192−207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848
Lillis, T. (2019) ‘“Academic literacies”: sustaining a critical space on writing in academia’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15, pp.1−18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.565
Lillis, T., Harrington, K., Lea, M.R. and Mitchell, S. (2015a) Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press LLC.
Lillis, T., Harrington, K., Lea, M.R. and Mitchell, S. (2015b) ‘Introduction’ in H. Lillis, K. Harrington, M.R. Lea and S. Mitchell (eds.) Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press LLC.
Lillis, T. and Scott, M. (2007) ‘Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy’, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), pp.5−32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
Lillis, T. and Tuck, J. (2016) ‘Academic literacies: a critical lens on writing and reading in the academy’, in K. Hyland and P. Shaw (eds.) The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. London: Routledge, pp.30−43.
Lillis, T. and Turner, J. (2001) ‘Student writing in higher education: contemporary confusion, traditional concerns’, Teaching in Higher Education, 6, pp.57−68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029608
Maton, K. (2013a) Knowledge and knowers: towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.
Maton, K. (2013b) ‘Making semantic waves: a key to cumulative knowledge-building’, Linguistics and Education, 24(1), pp.8−22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005
Matthews, M.R. (2020) ‘Philosophical problems with constructivism: some considerations for student-centered learning and teaching’, in S. Hoidn and M. Klemencic (eds.) The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education. London: Routledge, pp.47−64.
Murray, N. and Muller, A. (2018) ‘Developing academic literacy through a decentralised model of English language provision’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(10), pp.1348−1362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1483015
Paxton, M. and Frith, V. (2015) ‘Transformative and normative? Implications for academic literacies research in quantitative disciplines’, in T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M.R. Lea and S. Mitchell (eds.) Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press LLC, pp.155−163.
Perkins, D. (2006) ‘Constructivism and troublesome knowledge’, in J.H. Meyer and R. Land (eds.) Overcoming barriers to student understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge, pp.33−47.
Shay, S. (2008) ‘Beyond social constructivist perspectives on assessment: the centring of knowledge’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), pp.595−605. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334970
Sjøberg, S. (2010) ‘Constructivism and learning’, in P. Peterso, E. Baker and B. McGaw (eds.) International encyclopaedia of education. Philadelphia: Elsevier, pp.485−490.
Smith, P.V. and Baratta, A. (2016) ‘Religion and literacies in higher education: scoping the possibilities for faith-based meaning making’, Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning (CriSTaL), 4, pp.68−87. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC199928 (Accessed: 30 Aug 2024).
Street, B.V. (2012) ‘New literacy studies’, in M. Grenfell, D. Bloome, C. Hardy, K. Pahl, J. Rowsell and B. Street (eds.) Language, ethnography, and education. New York: Routledge, pp.27−49.
Taylor, S.D., Noorloos, R. and Bakker, A. (2017) ‘Mastering as an inferentialist alternative to the acquisition and participation metaphors for learning’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(4), pp.769−784. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12264
Wingate, U. and Tribble, C. (2011) ‘The best of both worlds? Towards an English for academic purposes/academic literacies writing pedagogy’, Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), pp.481−495. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630
Woolgar, S. (1986) ‘On the alleged distinction between discourse and praxis’, Social Studies of Science, 16(2), pp.309−317. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312786016002006
Wrigglesworth, J. (2019) ‘Pedagogical applications of academic literacies theory: a reflection and case study’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15, pp.1−21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.552
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
