Finding quality in quality improvement: creativity and credibility in higher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1258

Keywords:

quality assurance, third space professionals, credibility, educational developers

Abstract

This opinion piece explores the importance of credibility, reciprocity, and creativity in the quality assurance work of boundary-crossing third space professionals. As educational support professionals (ESPs), we believe that our multiple sources of knowledge and liminal positions are invaluable in guiding quality assurance processes. Our discussion is grounded in Little and Green’s (2022) credibility framework and emphasises the importance of creativity to ensure authentic continuous improvement within a mandatory provincial audit. We suggest that it is imperative, both individually and institutionally, to champion third space professionals in quality assurance roles and ensure they receive the resources they require to meaningfully engage in this work. 

Author Biographies

Nevena Martinović, Queen’s University, Canada

Nevena Martinović is an Educational Developer at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, where her work focuses on curriculum development and continuous improvement. She is passionate about transparency, creativity, and accessibility in educational spaces. In addition to her work on educational development, Nevena publishes research on intersections of aging and ability in the fields of eighteenth-century studies and theatre and performance studies. She also teaches courses on English Language and Literature at the Royal Military College.

Emma McCallum, Queen’s University, Canada

Emma McCallum is an Education and Learning Coordinator in the Human Rights and Equity Office at Queen’s University in Ontario, Canada. Emma has researched and written about 2SLGBTQIA+ students’ experiences of emotional labour in public school. Emma’s research interests are centred around 2SLGBTQIA+ students’ experiences of schooling and social justice education in post-secondary contexts.

References

Grass, J. (2010) “A new council to oversee program quality assurance at Ontario universities,” Council of Ontario Universities, 16 July. Available at: https://cou.ca/articles/new-council-to-oversee-quality-assurance-at-on-universities/ (Accessed: 1 March 2024).

Graham, C. (2012) ‘Transforming spaces and identities: The contributions of professional staff to learning spaces in higher education,’ Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(4), pp.437–452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.696326

Hall, J. (2022) ‘Understanding and Debating the Third Space,’ in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. London: UK, Routledge, pp.26-32.

Henkin, A.B. and Persson, D. (1992) ‘Faculty as gatekeepers: non-academic staff participation in university governance,’ Journal of Educational Administration, 30(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239210014487

Kallenberg, T. (2016) ‘Interacting spheres revisited: academics and administrators between dualism and cooperation’, in R.M.O Pritchard, A. Pausits and J. Williams (eds) Positioning Higher Education Institutions, Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers, pp.177-197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-660-6_10.

Kehm, B.M. (2015) ‘Academics and new higher education professionals: tensions, reciprocal influences and forms of professionalization’, in T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, and B.H. Kehm (eds) Academic work and careers in Europe: trends, challenges, perspectives, Springer International Publishing, pp. 177-200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10720-2_9

Little, D. and Green D.A. (2022) ‘Credibility in educational development: trustworthiness, expertise, and identification’, Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), pp.804-819. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1871325

McKay, F. and Robson, J. (2023) ‘‘Structured Agency’, normalising power, and third space workers: higher educational professional services staff as regulatory policy actors,’ Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(5), pp.633-646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2177526

Smith, C., Holden, M., Yu, E. and Hanlon, P. (2021) ‘‘So what do you do?’: Third space professionals navigating a Canadian university context’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(5), pp.501-519. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1884513

Szekeres, J. (2011) ‘Professional staff carve out a new space,’ Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), pp.679–691. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.621193

Whitchurch, C. (2008) ‘Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), pp.377-396. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00387.x

Whitchurch, C. (2012) Reconstructing Identities in Higher Education: The Rise of Third Space Professionals. London: Routledge.

Whitchurch, C. (2015) ‘The rise of third space professionals: paradoxes and dilemmas’, in U. Teichler and W.K Cummings (eds) Forming, recruiting and managing the academic profession. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp.1–328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16080-1_5

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

How to Cite

Martinović, N. and McCallum, E. (2025) “Finding quality in quality improvement: creativity and credibility in higher education”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1258.

Issue

Section

Leadership, influence and credibility