Knowledge, distributed leadership and (structured) agency: a view on academic policy curation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1250

Keywords:

academic policy, quality, regulation, third space, professional services

Abstract

This opinion piece explores some of the experiences encountered by the non-teaching staff responsible for curating academic policy in institutions. As the framework that upholds standards in universities, academic policy bears significant influence on the whole university community. Academic policy can provide stability to institutions – a fact that should not be undervalued given the ‘supercomplex’ (Barnett, 2000) environment in which the workforce now operates. In this light, the opinion piece illustrates the need for a different type of academic policymaking. It also identifies the potential for existing teams to fill this gap. Despite being a function with a long history in universities, teams responsible for the assurance and management of academic quality have generally been overlooked as a mitigating factor against the uncertainty of an ever-changing political and regulatory environment. The author will suggest that, throughout their policy work, Quality professionals are unrecognised catalysts for operational, pedagogic and strategic change. The discussion will underscore their importance as not simply translators but narrators of academic policy. The piece will close with some reflections on the personal, cultural and structural constraints that limit the value that these professionals can bring to their universities. Threats to colleagues' agency should be considered threats to the compliance, agility and general effectiveness of academic policy. The conclusion will suggest some solutions that colleagues may wish to consider. Discussions are contextualised within theories and frameworks related to educational policymaking, the influence of neoliberal government agendas, and the experience of third-space professionals.

Author Biography

Françoise McKay, Nottingham Trent University

Françoise McKay is the Academic Quality Manager at Nottingham Trent University. With a background in educational research and development, she has, in recent years, transitioned into quality assurance, developing a keen interest in exploring the identity and positionality of quality professionals at a time when such roles are becoming increasingly pivotal in balancing compliance and the enhancement of academic provision within English universities.

References

Ball, S.J., Maguire, M., Braun, A. and Hoskins, K. (2011) ‘Policy actors: doing policy work in schools’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), pp.625–639. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565

Barkas, L.A., Scott, J.M., Poppitt, N.J. and Smith, P.J. (2019) ’Tinker, tailor, policymaker: can the UK government’s teaching excellence framework deliver its objectives?’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(6), pp.801–813. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1408789

Barnett, R. (2000) Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

Gresham, J. (2014) Perceptions of role and identity among learning and teaching support staff in higher education: an institutional case study. EdD Thesis. University of Sheffield. Available at: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/7183/1/EdD%20Thesis%20Jacqueline%20Gresham%20Perceptions%20of%20identityamended.pdf (Accessed: 12 November 2024).

Melling, L. (2018) ‘What’s in a name? Job title and working identity in professional services staff in higher education’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23 (2-3), pp.48-53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1535459

Oancea, A. (2019) ‘Research governance and the future(s) of research assessment’, Palgrave Communications volume, 5(27), Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0213-6

Saunders, M. and Sin, C. (2015) ‘Middle managers’ experience of policy implementation and mediation in the context of the Scottish Quality Enhancement Framework’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), pp.135–150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.892056

Strathern, M. (2000) Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.

Whitchurch, C. (2004) ‘Administrative managers - a critical link’, Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), pp.280-298. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00274.x

Whitchurch, C. (2015) ‘The rise of third space professionals: paradoxes and dilemmas’, in U. Teichler and W.C. Cummings (eds.) Recruiting and managing the academic profession. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 79-100.

Zahir, A. (2010) ‘Third space professionals as policy actors’, Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung, 5(4), pp.46–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-5-04/05

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

How to Cite

McKay, F. (2025) “Knowledge, distributed leadership and (structured) agency: a view on academic policy curation”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1250.

Issue

Section

Leadership, influence and credibility