Revisiting principles of partnership working in the third space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1245Keywords:
COVID-19, collaboration, principles for practiceAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic catalysed significant shifts within higher education, prompting institutions to re-evaluate their approaches to partnership working. Collaborative efforts across institutional domains gained prominence, underlining the strategic importance of third-space professionals in facilitating agile decision-making and solution implementation. Here, they demonstrated resilience and adaptability, navigating the pandemic’s complexities while addressing the tandem feelings of messiness and uncertainty. They cultivated open mindsets and embraced a playful praxis, one emergent as an essential strategy for fostering trust and facilitating social learning amidst change. However, recognition and reward for such professionals remain complex, being at times hindered by the fluidity of their roles and fragmented nature of institutional acknowledgment. Our contention is that the culture evident during the pandemic that fostered meaningful collaborative practices and amplified third-space professionals is in danger of being lost.
Initially discussed by Parkes, Blackwell Young, and Cleaver (2016), this opinion piece revisits five principles of partnership working in the context of third-space working. These principles emphasised a need for understanding motivations for collaboration; the necessity of strategic support; provision of suitable reward and recognition systems; developing a culture that embraces change that is fostered through honesty and openness. If universities are to be successful in addressing the ever-evolving ‘wicked’ problems roaming the higher education landscape, a sustainable collective approach underpinned by the five principles remain.
References
Akerman, K. (2020) ‘Invisible imposter: identity in institutions’, in Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 24(4), pp.126–130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2020.1734683
Akerman, K. (2022) ‘Close encounters of the third kind’, in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds) The impact of the integrated practitioner: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge, pp.96-201.
Black, K. (2024) ‘Doing academic careers differently’, WONKHE. Available at: https://wonkhe.com/blogs/doing-academic-careers-differently/ (Accessed: 31 February 2024).
Blackwell Young, J. and Millard, L. (2023) ‘Reflections on 15 years of working in student partnerships: successes, challenges and the future possibilities’, Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 11(3), pp.65-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i3.597
Boulton, J., Allen, P. and Bowman, C. (2015) Embracing complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A. and Felten, P. (2011) ‘Changing participants in pedagogical planning: students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula’, International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), pp.133-145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Collini, S. (2012) What are universities for? London: Penguin.
Denney, F. (2022) ‘Building bridges and connections: the language used to connect and define communities in the third space’, in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge, pp. 50-62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037569-7
Freire, P. (1968) Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
Freire, P. (2013) Education for critical consciousness. London: Bloomsbury.
Headland, C. (2024) Pedagogy and pancakes. Available at: https://chrisheadleand.com/pedagogy-and-pancakes/ (Accessed: 14 March 2020).
Healey, M., Flint, A. and Harrington, K. (2014) Developing students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Holflod, K. (2023) ‘Playful learning and boundary-crossing collaboration in higher education: a narrative and synthesising review’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(4), pp.465-480. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2142101
hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee (2018) Treating students fairly: the economics of post-school education, 2nd Report, Session 2017–19 [online]. Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/contentassets/5e2c15a0f77f45d4a2ad3cbc508f7536/education-finance-summary-pamphlet.pdf (Accessed: 20 July 2021).
Hughes, J., Cureton, D. and Jones, J. (2021) ‘“I’ll play the game, but I cannot stay”: The role of third space professionals encouraging the retention, success and sense of belonging of undergraduate students’, Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 14(3), pp.1-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v14i3.1202
Macfarlane, B. (2011) ‘The morphing of academic practice: unbundling and the rise of the para-academic’, Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), pp.59–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00467.x
McIntosh, E. and Nutt, D. (eds) (2022a) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge.
McIntosh, E. and Nutt, D. (2022b) ‘Introduction and literature review’, in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge, pp.1-18.
Millard, L., Bartholomew, P., Brand, S. and Nygaard, C. (2013) ‘Why student engagement matters’, in C. Nygaard, S. Brand, P. Bartholomew and L. Millard (eds) Student engagement: identity, motivation and community. Oxford: Libri Publishing, pp.1-15.
Nutt, D. and McIntosh, E. (2022) ‘Dancing in the boundary lands through “interesting times”: educational development in the third space’, The SEDA Blog: Supporting and leading educational change, 31 March. Available at https://thesedablog.wordpress.com/2022/03/31/dancing-in-the-boundary-lands-through-interesting-times-educational-development-in-the-third-space/ (Accessed: 23 August 2024).
Parkes, S., Blackwell Young, J. and Cleaver, E. (2016) ‘Making partnerships work: practical strategies for building successful collaborations’, in M. Schneider, J. Kelsall and H. Webster (eds) Connecting the dots: collaboration across learning support professions in higher education to enhance student learning. Huddersfield: Innovative Libraries, pp.13-30. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1260.0404
Parkes, S., Blackwell Young, J., Cleaver, E. and Archibald, K. (2014) Academic and professional services in partnership literature review and overview of results. York: Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/academic-and-professional-services-partnership-literature-review-and-overview-results.
Quinsee, S. (2022) ‘Leadership in the third space’, in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds) The impact of the integrated practitioner: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge, pp.33-39.
Rhoades, G. (2009) ‘Envisioning invisible workforces: enhancing intellectual capital’, in G. Gordon and C. Whitchurch (eds) Academic and professional identities in higher education. London: Routledge, pp.53-72.
Scottish Funding Council (2021) Coherence and sustainability: a review of tertiary education and research. Available at: https://www.sfc.ac.uk/reform/review/ (Accessed: 20 March 2024).
Seal, M. (2021) Hopeful pedagogies in higher education. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Singer, S., Bellamy. G., Brown, R., Cleland Woods, H., Labrosse, N., Senn, H. and Vezza, M. (2021) ‘Togetherness: the central tenet of an effective institutional online pivot’, Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 9(2), pp.82-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.491
Stoltenkamp, J., van de Heyde, V. and Siebrits, A. (2017) ‘The third-space professional: a reflective case study on maintaining relationships within a complex higher education institution’, Reflective Practice, 18(1), pp.14-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1214120
Taylor, C.A. (2017) ‘Rethinking the empirical in higher education: post-qualitative inquiry as a less comfortable social science’, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40(3), pp. 311-324.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1256984
Thomas, L. (2012) Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation/HEFCE.
Whitchurch, C. (2013) Reconstructing identities in higher education. London: Routledge.
Zepke, N. (2018). ‘Student engagement in neo-liberal times: What is missing?’, Higher Education Research and Development, 37(2), pp.433-446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
