Logs for acid-base chemistry: illustrating the potential of multidisciplinary learning support interventions from the third space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1244Keywords:
chemistry education, acid-base chemistry, third-space professional, contextualised learning, mathematical logarithmsAbstract
The growing accessibility of higher education over the last century is a major accomplishment and should be continuously supported. A particular barrier to widening participation is that curricula across numerous disciplines rely on assumed knowledge for enrolling students. The gaps between this assumed and actual pre-existing knowledge are dispersed throughout institutions, making them difficult to bridge. Our institution runs seven different first-year chemistry subjects, all of which require students to use mathematical logarithms to solve acid-base chemistry problems. Our case study illustrates that third space practitioners with disciplinary expertise, such as those working in STEM support for learning, are uniquely positioned to address challenges like this. As a chemistry educator and mathematics educator employed in the third space, we co-designed and co-delivered a one-hour online workshop titled “logs for acid-base chemistry”. The session explicitly taught logarithmic concepts in context to students from four different chemistry units. Observations made during the workshop suggest that the intervention was able to efficiently improve acid-base calculation confidence in students from all attending cohorts. Finally, the broader benefits of subject specialist third space staff in higher education are discussed in light of the case study findings. Overall, the efficiency of this intervention highlights the under-researched potential of embedding disciplinary experts in third space learning support roles.
References
Australian Universities Accord Review Panel. (2024). Australian Universities Accord Final Report. https://www.education.gov.au/australian-universities-accord/resources/final-report
Australia’s Chief Scientist. (2020). Mapping university prerequisites in Australia. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/news-and-media/mapping-university-prerequisites-australia
Bain, K., Rodriguez, J.-M. G., & Towns, M. H. (2019). Chemistry and Mathematics: Research and Frameworks To Explore Student Reasoning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10), 2086–2096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00523
Berger, C. F., Pintrich, P. R., & Stemmer, P. M. (1987). Cognitive consequences of student estimation on linear and logarithmic scales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240506
Bickle, E., Bishopp-Martin, S., Canton, U., Chin, P., Johnson, I., Kantcheva, R., Nodder, J., Rafferty, V., Sum, K., & Welton, K. (2021). Emerging from the third space chrysalis: Experiences in a non-hierarchical, collaborative research community of practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(7), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.7.9
Brown, S., & Naiker, M. (2018). Attitude to the subject of chemistry in nursing and health science undergraduate students. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 5(2), 192–1965.
Burke, P. J. (2002). Accessing Education: Effectively Widening Participation. Trentham.
Chesnut, R., Anderson, G. W., Buncher, O., Dietrich, M. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Ross, L. J. (2022). Are Prerequisite Courses Barriers to Pharmacy Admission or the Keys to Student Success? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10), ajpe8920. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8920
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (Eds.). (2001). Blending basics. Cogl, 11(3–4), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.014
Cros, D., Maurin, M., Amouroux, R., Chastrette∗, M., Leber, J., & Fayol, M. (1986). Conceptions of first‐year university students of the constituents of matter and the notions of acids and bases. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080307
Devine, C., Wilson, T., & Moody, H. (2022). [Expert] Guide on the Side: One University’s Response to Support for Learning in STEM-Based Disciplines. In H. Huijser, M. Y. C. A. Kek, & F. F. Padró (Eds.), Student Support Services (pp. 677–689). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5852-5_16
Di Miceli, M. (2024). Diversity in the United Kingdom: Quantification for higher education in comparison to the general population. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12595
Esterling, K. M., & Bartels, L. (2013). Atoms-First Curriculum: A Comparison of Student Success in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300725m
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X
Feldt, R. C., & Donahue, J. M. (1989). Predicting nursing GPA and national council licensure examination for registered nurses (NCLEX-RN): A thorough analysis. Psychological Reports, 64(2), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.2.415
Grove, N., & Bretz, S. (2008). Measuring What Students Know about How to Learn Chemistry (pp. 159–165).
Jackson, D. C., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). A hybrid model of mathematics support for science students emphasizing basic skills and discipline relevance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 846–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.808769
Kampamba, R. (2023). First-year University Students’ Experiences in Learning Threshold Concepts of Acids-Bases Chemistry. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 11(1), 18–30.
Lawson, D., Grove, M., & Croft, T. (2020). The evolution of mathematics support: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1224–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1662120
Lightbody, I., Wilson, T., & Medland, R. (2018). The evolution and revolution of STEM support at QUT. In R. Field & K. Nelson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Students, Transitions, Achievement, Retention and Success (STARS) Conference. Unistars. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/232150/
McIntosh, E., & Nutt, D. (2022). The Impact of the Integrated Practitioner in Higher Education: Studies in Third Space Professionalism. Routledge.
Ní Fhloinn, E., Fitzmaurice, O., Mac an Bhaird, C., & O’Sullivan, C. (2014). Student perception of the impact of mathematics support in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(7), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.892161
OECD. (n.d.). Adult education level [dataset]. https://data.oecd.org/eduatt/adult-education-level.htm
Pace, D. (2004). The Amateur in the Operating Room: History and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The American Historical Review, 109(4), 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/109.4.1171
Romine, W. L., Todd, A. N., & Clark, T. B. (2016). How Do Undergraduate Students Conceptualize Acid–Base Chemistry? Measurement of a Concept Progression. Science Education, 100(6), 1150–1183. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21240
Sellar, S., & Storan, J. (2013). ‘There Was Something about Aspiration’: Widening Participation Policy Affects in England and Australia. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 19(2), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.7227/JACE.19.2.4
Stone, D. C. (2021). Student success and the high school-university transition: 100 years of chemistry education research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00085C
Watters, D. J., & Watters, J. J. (2006). Student understanding of pH: “I don’t know what the log actually is, i only know where the button is on my calculator.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(4), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042628
Whitchurch, C. (2023). Rehabilitating Third Space Professionals in Contemporary Higher Education Institutions. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 34, 23–33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).