Logs for acid-base chemistry: illustrating the potential of multidisciplinary learning support interventions from the third space

Authors

  • Joshua Wang Queensland University of Technology
  • Elise Kenny Queensland University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1244

Keywords:

chemistry education, acid-base chemistry, third-space professional, contextualised learning, mathematical logarithms

Abstract

The growing accessibility of higher education over the last century is a major accomplishment and should be continuously supported. A particular barrier to widening participation is that curricula across numerous disciplines rely on assumed knowledge for enrolling students.  The gaps between this assumed and actual pre-existing knowledge are dispersed throughout institutions, making them difficult to bridge. Our institution runs seven different first-year chemistry subjects, all of which require students to use mathematical logarithms to solve acid-base chemistry problems.  Our case study illustrates that third space practitioners with disciplinary expertise, such as those working in STEM support for learning, are uniquely positioned to address challenges like this.  As a chemistry educator and mathematics educator employed in the third space, we co-designed and co-delivered a one-hour online workshop titled “logs for acid-base chemistry”. The session explicitly taught logarithmic concepts in context to students from four different chemistry units. Observations made during the workshop suggest that the intervention was able to efficiently improve acid-base calculation confidence in students from all attending cohorts.  Finally, the broader benefits of subject specialist third space staff in higher education are discussed in light of the case study findings. Overall, the efficiency of this intervention highlights the under-researched potential of embedding disciplinary experts in third space learning support roles.

Author Biographies

Joshua Wang, Queensland University of Technology

Joshua Wang (FHEA) is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Department of Research at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, where he specialises in neuroscience, meta-research and research training.  Prior to this, he was the STEM Educator (Chemistry) in the Queensland University of Technology’s Learning and Teaching Unit (2020-2023).  His educational research predominately examines injustice in scholarly publishing and doctoral education.  He was recently appointed to the Editorial Board of JANZSSA – Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association.  In 2022, he was a co-recipient of an Australian Awards for University Teaching (AAUT) Citation for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning.

Elise Kenny, Queensland University of Technology

Elise Kenny is a STEM Educator at Queensland University of Technology. With a background in physics research and tertiary education research, she specializes in helping university students with mathematics. Elise is passionate about transforming students’ mindsets towards mathematics. She focuses particularly on those entering fields requiring applied maths who have limited prior exposure or who have experienced a lack of success in mathematics. She is dedicated to making mathematics accessible and engaging, fostering a supportive learning environment that encourages confidence and success.

References

Australian Universities Accord Review Panel. (2024). Australian Universities Accord Final Report. https://www.education.gov.au/australian-universities-accord/resources/final-report

Australia’s Chief Scientist. (2020). Mapping university prerequisites in Australia. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/news-and-media/mapping-university-prerequisites-australia

Bain, K., Rodriguez, J.-M. G., & Towns, M. H. (2019). Chemistry and Mathematics: Research and Frameworks To Explore Student Reasoning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10), 2086–2096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00523

Berger, C. F., Pintrich, P. R., & Stemmer, P. M. (1987). Cognitive consequences of student estimation on linear and logarithmic scales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240506

Bickle, E., Bishopp-Martin, S., Canton, U., Chin, P., Johnson, I., Kantcheva, R., Nodder, J., Rafferty, V., Sum, K., & Welton, K. (2021). Emerging from the third space chrysalis: Experiences in a non-hierarchical, collaborative research community of practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(7), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.7.9

Brown, S., & Naiker, M. (2018). Attitude to the subject of chemistry in nursing and health science undergraduate students. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 5(2), 192–1965.

Burke, P. J. (2002). Accessing Education: Effectively Widening Participation. Trentham.

Chesnut, R., Anderson, G. W., Buncher, O., Dietrich, M. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Ross, L. J. (2022). Are Prerequisite Courses Barriers to Pharmacy Admission or the Keys to Student Success? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10), ajpe8920. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8920

Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (Eds.). (2001). Blending basics. Cogl, 11(3–4), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.014

Cros, D., Maurin, M., Amouroux, R., Chastrette∗, M., Leber, J., & Fayol, M. (1986). Conceptions of first‐year university students of the constituents of matter and the notions of acids and bases. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080307

Devine, C., Wilson, T., & Moody, H. (2022). [Expert] Guide on the Side: One University’s Response to Support for Learning in STEM-Based Disciplines. In H. Huijser, M. Y. C. A. Kek, & F. F. Padró (Eds.), Student Support Services (pp. 677–689). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5852-5_16

Di Miceli, M. (2024). Diversity in the United Kingdom: Quantification for higher education in comparison to the general population. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12595

Esterling, K. M., & Bartels, L. (2013). Atoms-First Curriculum: A Comparison of Student Success in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300725m

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X

Feldt, R. C., & Donahue, J. M. (1989). Predicting nursing GPA and national council licensure examination for registered nurses (NCLEX-RN): A thorough analysis. Psychological Reports, 64(2), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.2.415

Grove, N., & Bretz, S. (2008). Measuring What Students Know about How to Learn Chemistry (pp. 159–165).

Jackson, D. C., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). A hybrid model of mathematics support for science students emphasizing basic skills and discipline relevance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 846–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.808769

Kampamba, R. (2023). First-year University Students’ Experiences in Learning Threshold Concepts of Acids-Bases Chemistry. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 11(1), 18–30.

Lawson, D., Grove, M., & Croft, T. (2020). The evolution of mathematics support: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1224–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1662120

Lightbody, I., Wilson, T., & Medland, R. (2018). The evolution and revolution of STEM support at QUT. In R. Field & K. Nelson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Students, Transitions, Achievement, Retention and Success (STARS) Conference. Unistars. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/232150/

McIntosh, E., & Nutt, D. (2022). The Impact of the Integrated Practitioner in Higher Education: Studies in Third Space Professionalism. Routledge.

Ní Fhloinn, E., Fitzmaurice, O., Mac an Bhaird, C., & O’Sullivan, C. (2014). Student perception of the impact of mathematics support in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(7), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.892161

OECD. (n.d.). Adult education level [dataset]. https://data.oecd.org/eduatt/adult-education-level.htm

Pace, D. (2004). The Amateur in the Operating Room: History and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The American Historical Review, 109(4), 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/109.4.1171

Romine, W. L., Todd, A. N., & Clark, T. B. (2016). How Do Undergraduate Students Conceptualize Acid–Base Chemistry? Measurement of a Concept Progression. Science Education, 100(6), 1150–1183. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21240

Sellar, S., & Storan, J. (2013). ‘There Was Something about Aspiration’: Widening Participation Policy Affects in England and Australia. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 19(2), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.7227/JACE.19.2.4

Stone, D. C. (2021). Student success and the high school-university transition: 100 years of chemistry education research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00085C

Watters, D. J., & Watters, J. J. (2006). Student understanding of pH: “I don’t know what the log actually is, i only know where the button is on my calculator.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(4), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042628

Whitchurch, C. (2023). Rehabilitating Third Space Professionals in Contemporary Higher Education Institutions. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 34, 23–33.

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

How to Cite

Wang, J. and Kenny, E. (2025) “Logs for acid-base chemistry: illustrating the potential of multidisciplinary learning support interventions from the third space”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1244.

Issue

Section

Identity and positioning