Enhancing professional development for Third Space roles: reflections on the added value of Learning Circles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi32.1228

Keywords:

boundary work, learning circles, community engaged research and learning, third space professionalism

Abstract

This paper explores how Learning Circles can support higher education staff in navigating the complexities of contemporary educational landscapes with greater confidence, creativity, and efficacy. It presents qualitative research rooted in the three-year Erasmus+ project CIRCLET, involving five European universities. Learning Circles were implemented as a core component of professional development programmes, aiming to foster quality integration of Community Engaged Research and Learning (CERL) in academic practice. Drawing on a collaborative autoethnographic research design, we reflected on our experiences as Learning Circle designers, facilitators, and participants to identify manifestations of professional growth emanating from our project activities. We build on four different Learning Circle examples, analysing their features through a Third Spaces lens. We demonstrate that Learning Circles have the potential to create agentic, distributed, and adaptive professional learning spaces, enabling participating staff in reimagining their professional space, so that they feel better prepared to assume the hybrid roles and responsibilities that practices of engagement typically entail. We put forward a number of guiding principles for Learning Circle facilitators, emphasising the importance of promoting inquiry-led approaches, embedded in day-to-day practice, fostering active participation and critical reflection on one’s positionality.

Author Biographies

Linde Moriau, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Linde Moriau is working at Vrije Universiteit Brussel’s central Department of Education as  curriculum developer and educational assistant. She has expertise in intercultural studies, transdisciplinarity, and collaborative curriculum making. Over the past years, Linde has been coordinating a strategic project on Community Engaged Research and Learning (UNIVER.CITY). She was involved in the CIRCLET project as Learning Circle facilitator, broker, and assisted in the project coordinating and reflection meetings. Currently, Linde is co-coordinating a curriculum(re)design programme in a follow-up Erasmus+ project called SPACE (Supporting Professionals and Academics for Community Engagement).

Réka Matolay, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary

Réka Matolay, PhD., is one of the founders and Head of Corvinus Science Shop as well as an associate professor at Corvinus University of Budapest. Her main teaching and research fields are social entrepreneurship and social innovation; community engaged research and learning; and responsible research and innovation. She was involved in the team designing and facilitating learning circles in CIRCLET Erasmus+ project and as the local lead for LOESS - Literacy boost through an Operational Educational Ecosystem of Societal actors on Soil health Horizon project.   

Emma McKenna, Queen’s University Belfast

Emma McKenna has co-ordinated The Science Shop in Queen’s University Belfast since 2001. The Science Shop is an award-winning community engaged research initiative, facilitating students to work on curriculum-based research projects generated from the needs of community partners. She is a leading member of the Living Knowledge International Science Shop Network, an Associate Editor for the NCCPE’s Research For All journal and a Principal Fellow of the Higher Education Academy. Between 2019-2022 she co-ordinated the Erasmus+ CIRCLET project which aimed to support lecturers to rethink their curricula to create space for community engaged research and learning. She acted as Deputy Co-ordinator and Policy Lead on the H2020-funded Enhancing Responsible Research and Innovation through Curricula in Higher Education (EnRRICH) project between 2015-2018. She has mentored Science Shops across the world, including in Canada, India, Hungary, France and Spain.  

Andrea Toarniczky, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary

Andrea Toarniczky is associate professor at Organizational Behaviour Department of Corvinus University of Budapest (CUB), where she teaches Organizational Behaviour, Organizational Culture, Diversity Management and gives personal development trainings at master, postgraduate and EMBA level. She got her Ph.D. in 2012 from CUB (Hungary). Her main fields of research are socialisation in organisational and professional contexts of diverse groups, professional and career development in academia. Andrea participated in different national and international research projects (e.g. EnRRICH (H2020 project), CIRCLET (Erasmus+), ProAbility (EGT project)). She published several articles in Hungarian and international journals, and conference papers at different international conferences. 

Judit Gáspár, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary

Judit Gáspár, PhD, is associate professor and Head of the Decision Sciences Department at the Corvinus University of Budapest, lecturing Decision-Making Skills, Decision Techniques, Corporate Strategy, with research interest on decision-making, strategy-as-practice, foresight, participatory and reflexive methodologies. Judit is involved in research programmes e.g. Curriculum Innovation through Research with Communities: Learning circles of Educators and Technology (CIRCLET); Enhancing Responsible Research and Innovation Through Curricula in Higher Education; Ecological Horizon Scanning: Hungary 2050; Mobilising Corporate Foresight Potential among V4 Countries. Founding member of Corvinus Science Shop to support service learning and community-based research activities. Trained facilitator of Social Dreaming and Social Photo Matrix, methodologies that focus on the psycho- and socio-analytic study of organisations/systems.  

Márta Frigyik, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary

Márta Frigyik works as partnership coordinator in the Corvinus Science Shop setting up course projects and thesis work between local community partners and lecturers, researchers and students of Corvinus. With a background in Management and Organization development Márta facilitates the community partners of the science shop to articulate their research needs and questions and supports the cooperation for Community Engaged Research and Learning to happen. Márta participated in the E+ CIRCLET (Curriculum Innovation through Research with Communities: Learning circles of Educators and Technology) project as a member of Corvinus Science Shop. 

Catherine Bates, Technological University Dublin

Catherine Bates, PhD, is Research Engagement Lead in TU Dublin. Prior to taking up this role in 2023, she led Students Learning With Communities, a flagship community engagement project in TU Dublin. She led the development, design and delivery of the CIRCLET project’s innovative 5 ECTS module and led workpackages in both the EnRRICH and PERARES projects. She is a leading member of the Living Knowledge Network and has published widely on community engaged research and learning.

References

Adams, T. E., Holman Jones, S. and Ellis, C. (2014) Autoethnography: understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12111

Aksim, R. E. (2005) Learning circle basics. Contents – Facilitation. Available at: http://aksim.org/ (Accessed: 20 March 2024).

Annala, J., Lindén, J., Mäkinen, M. and Henriksson, J. (2023) ‘Understanding academic agency in curriculum change in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), pp.1310-1327. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1881772

Bates, C., McCann, S. and McGowan, C. (2022) Guide for facilitators: online continuing professional development module on embedding community engaged research and learning in higher education curricula, CIRCLET Erasmus+ Project Report. Available at: https://circlet.eu/online-module/ (Accessed: 20 February 2024).

Beyes, T. and Michels, C. (2011) ‘The production of educational space: heterotopia and the business university’, Management Learning, 42(5), pp.521-536. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611400001

Bhabha, H. K. (1994) ‘Frontlines/Borderposts’, in A. Bammer (ed.) Displacements - cultural identities in question. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. pp. 269-273.

Bohle Carbonell, K., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M. and Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014) ‘How experts deal with novel situations: a review of adaptive expertise’, Educational Research Review, 12, pp.14-29.

Brew, A., Boud, D., Lucas, L. and Crawford, K. (2018) ‘Academic artisans in the research university’, Higher Education, 76(1), pp.115-127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0200-7

Burleigh, D. and Burm, S. (2022) ‘Doing duoethnography: addressing essential methodological questions’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221140876

Callender, C., Locke, W. and Marginson, S. (eds.) (2020) Changing higher education for a changing world. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Available at: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/61930/9781350108424.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y (Accessed: 1 March 2024).

Chang, H. (2008) Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. L. (2009) Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. L. (2021) ‘Inquiry in the age of data: a commentary’, Teaching Education, 32(1), pp.99-107. https://doi.org//10.1080/10476210.2020.1868142

Custer, D. (2014) ‘Autoethnography as a transformative research method’, The Qualitative Report, 19(37), pp.1-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014

Dajani, M.F. (2014) ‘Learning circles: promoting collaborative learning culture for teacher professional development’, Arab World English Journal, 5(3), pp.142–153.

Deng, Y., Zeng, H., Xu, A. and Chen, Y. (2022) 'Based on role expectation to discuss role ambiguity and practice of university teachers in business administration', Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/3389/fpsyg.2022.789806

De Rijdt, C., Stes, A., van der Vleuten, C. and Dochy, F. (2013) ‘Influencing variables and moderators of transfer of learning to the workplace within the area of staff development in higher education: research review’, Educational Research Review, 8, pp.48-74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.007

Dickson-Deane, C., Bristol, L., McNeil, D., Esnard, T. and Leacock, L. (2022) ‘Intersectionality and compromise: enacting government policies in the Caribbean’, in V. Dennen, C. Dickson-Deane, X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, S. Murthy and J. C. Richardson (eds.) Global perspectives on educational innovations for emergency situations. Cham: Springer, pp.119-128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99634-5_12

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Kärkkäinen, M. (1995) ‘Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex workactivities’, Learning and Instruction, 5, pp.319-336.

Hains-Wesson, R. and Rahman, N. (2023) ‘Third space key to learning and teaching achievement, but those who choose this career pathway are often unrecognised?’, Campus Morning Mail, 8 March. Available at: https://campusmorningmail.com.au/news/third-space-key-to-learning-and-teaching-achievement/?utm_source=sendgrid.com&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=website (Accessed: 6 September 2024).

Hunter, A. (2020) ‘Snapshots of selfhood: curating academic identity through visual autoethnography’, International Journal for Academic Development, 25(4), pp.310-323. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1755865

Jackson, A. Y. and Mazzei, L. A. (2013) ‘Plugging one text into another: thinking with theory in qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), pp.261-271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412471510

Koay, J. (2023) 'Self-directed professional development activities: an autoethnography', Teaching and Teacher Education, 133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104258

Lefebvre, H. (1991) The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lewis, C. (2002) Lesson study: a handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.

Little, J. W. (2002) ‘Professional community and the problem of high school reform’, International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), pp.693-714. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00066-1

Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2019) ‘”More than just a student”: how co-creation of the curriculum fosters third spaces in ways of working, identity, and impact’, International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), pp.34-49.

Moriau, L., Tondeur, J., Bertone, J., Huysmans, M., Temmerman, M., and Meurs, P. (2022) ‘The engagement CUBE: a dialogical tool for designing, facilitating and monitoring engaged research and teaching strategies’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(4), pp.783-798. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2021-0126

Noble, K., Macfarlane, K. and Cartmel, J. (2005) Circles of change: challenging orthodoxy in practitioner supervision. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

Pennington, J. L. (2007) ‘Silence in the classroom/whispers in the halls: autoethnography as pedagogy in white pre-service teacher education’, Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(1), pp.93-113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320601100393

Potter, J. and McDougall, J. (2017) Digital media, culture and education: theorising third space literacies. Palgrave Macmillan London. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55315-7

Roy, R. and Uekusa, S. (2020) ‘Collaborative autoethnography: “self-reflection” as a timely alternative research approach during the global pandemic’, Qualitative Research Journal, 20(4), pp.383-392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-06-2020-0054

Sinnayah, P., Ambler, T., Kelly, K., Konjarski, L., Tangalakis, K., Smallridge, A. (2023) ‘Reviewing the literature: collaborative professional learning for academics in higher education’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

Smith, C., Holden, M., Yu, E. and Hanlon, P. (2021) ‘So what do you do?: third space professionals navigating a Canadian university context’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(5), pp.505-519. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1884513

Soja, E. W. (1996) Thirdspace: expanding the geographical imagination. Blackwell: Wiley.

Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., Prideaux, D., Spencer, J. et al. (2016) ‘A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: a10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40’, Medical Teacher, 38(8), pp.769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851

Stevens, T. M., Day, I. N. Z., den Brok, P. J., Prins, F. J., Assen, H. J. H. E., ter Beek, M., Bombaerts, G., Coppoolse, R., et al. (2024) ‘Teacher professional learning and development in the context of educational innovations in higher education: a typology of practices’, Higher Education Research and Development, 43(2), pp.437-454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2246412

Suchman, L. (1994) ‘Working relations of technology production and use’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2, pp.21-39.

Sutherland, K., Elgort, I. and Tennent, E. (2020) Teaching and learning circles: developing reflective practice and enhancing teaching culture. Wellington, New Zealand, Ako Aotearoa (National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence).

Veles, N., Graham, C. and Ovaska, C. (2023) ‘University professional staff roles, identities, and spaces of interaction: systematic review of literature published in 2000–2020’, Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 7(2), pp.127-168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2023.2193826

Whitchurch, C. (2013) Reconstructing identities in higher education: the rise of ‘third space’ professionals. Routledge.

Whitchurch, C. (2018) ‘Being a higher education professional today: working in a third space’, in C. Bossu, and N. Brown (eds.) Professional and support staff in higher education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp.11-22.

Whitchurch, C. (2023) ‘Rehabilitating third space professionals in contemporary higher education institutions’, Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 33, pp.23-33.

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

How to Cite

Moriau, L., Matolay, R., McKenna, E., Toarniczky, A., Gáspár, J., Frigyik, M., & Bates, C. (2025). Enhancing professional development for Third Space roles: reflections on the added value of Learning Circles. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi32.1228

Issue

Section

Careers and professional development