Amplifying the value of the third space to support strategic curriculum change
Keywords:
third space, curriculum change, staff development, institutional changeAbstract
This case study presents how we at Kingston University have expanded our collaborative ‘third space’ to support the delivery of an ambitious blueprint of skills development in the curriculum. In 2022, Kingston embarked on an ambitious journey to roll out a progressive model of education through a new strategic initiative embedding personal and professional development for all undergraduate students as a core element of their course. This strategy was developed as a threefold response to an evolving education landscape in the UK. First, drawing on Kingston’s ‘Future Skills’ research on skills and the economy to influence at a sector level (Kingston University, 2023). Second, as a response to the updated OfS conditions of registration (specifically the B3 conditions). Third, to enhance our existing commitment to equitable and inclusive support for students.
To enable the ambition of our institutional approach, we recognised the importance of ensuring colleagues across the institution felt visible and involved as we implemented this programme at pace. Through a deliberate curriculum and staff development project to accelerate and amplify wider staff understanding and confidence, we have successfully built upon and modelled the value of the third space for the benefit of both students and staff. We discuss how the scale of structural change involved with its delivery amplified our existing ways of working; it challenged us to upscale our approach and legitimise different forms of knowledge from both staff and students from different parts of the university
References
Abegglen, S., Burns, T. and Sinfield, S. (2023) Collaboration in higher education. Bloomsbury Academic.
Annala, J. and Mäkinen, M. (2017) 'Communities of practice in higher education: contradictory narratives of a university-wide curriculum reform', Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), pp.1941-1957.
Bruner, J. S. (1960) The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Reprint. London: Penguin Classics, 2017.
hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Howson, C. and Kingsbury, M. (2021) ‘Curriculum change as transformational learning’, Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8), pp.1847-1866.
Kingston University (2023) Future Skills: The Kingston Approach. Available at: https://cdn.kingston.ac.uk/documents/user-upload/kingston-university-83c0c7036df-kingstonreportv20digital-final-.pdf (Accessed: 19 July 2024).
Livingston, K. and Ling, L. (2022) 'Third space workers in higher education in times of dislocated complexity’, European Journal of Education, 57(4), pp.646-658.
Whitchurch, C. (2006) ‘Who do they think they are? The changing identities of professional administrators and managers in UK Higher Education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), pp.159-171.
Zeichner, K. (2010) ‘Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education’, Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), pp.89-99.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).