LEGO, fishbowls, and collaboration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1219

Keywords:

collaboration, assessment, academic development, educator development, professional standards framework, third space

Abstract

This article reflects on what matters in collaboration. It is widely recognised that calls for ‘collaboration’ and ‘collaborative ways of working’ abound in research, scholarship, pedagogic practices, and beyond as a desirable student skill set (Veles, 2022; McKay and Sridharan, 2023), and a way to address complexity and problem-solving (Graesser et al., 2018; Scoular et al., 2020). Now, the recent iteration of the Advance HE Professional Standards Framework (2023) cites a new dimension of practice, PSF V5, that requires fellowship claimants to explicitly evidence how they ‘collaborate with others to enhance practice’ (p. 5). However, understandings of what constitutes collaboration remain fuzzy and—specifically in the context of university professionals—somewhat underexplored (Newell and Bain, 2019). Furthermore, collaboration often falls to so called ‘third-space’ professionals, as they occupy a natural (but not always comfortable) confluence between academics, researchers, professional services, and learner communities (Veles, Carter and Boon, 2018).

This article presents a session plan, which has been co-designed by two third-space professionals working within educator development. The session uses a novel assessment matrix—the 9 Domains of Collaboration—as an approach to explore and critique the defining characteristics of collaborative endeavour. The aim of this article is twofold. Firstly, the session plan and 9 Domains framework offers colleagues in higher education a tangible evaluative aid for provoking, tracing, and documenting collaborative practices. Secondly, we offer reflections on how collaboration is expressed in ways that align with PSF V5 and that amplify the work and contributions of the third space.

Author Biographies

Rebecca Edgerley, University of Exeter

Rebecca Edgerley is a Senior Educator Developer at the University of Exeter, UK, where she co-designs and delivers the Learning and Teaching in Higher Education programme for postgraduate teaching associates and professional-services colleagues. She also mentors and assesses colleagues seeking professional accreditation as fellows of AdvanceHE. Rebecca’s teaching and research interests include collaborative and reflective practices that involve creative methods. She is currently undertaking a PhD exploring how creative interventions shape interdisciplinary practices amongst university professionals.    

Russell Crawford, Falmouth University

Russell Crawford is Pro-Vice Chancellor Academic Services at Falmouth University, UK, with an active pedagogic research interest in gamification for learning and many years of academic development experience in implementing high-impact pedagogies. His own teaching and research background covers various educational contexts, from curriculum design, innovation in higher education, and assessment at UG and PG levels. Russell is a Senior Fellow of Advance HE, won the Times Higher Education ‘Most Innovative Teacher of the Year’ in 2017, and was awarded his National Teaching Fellowship in 2018. 

References

Advance HE (2023) Advance HE Professional Standards Framework. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/professional-standards-framework-teaching-and-supporting-learning-higher-education-0 (Accessed: 28 March 2024).

Bodies Collective (2023) The collaborative body in qualitative research: becoming bodyography. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320210

Bozeman, B., Gaughan, M., Youtie, J., Slade, C.P. and Rimes, H. (2016) ‘Research collaboration experiences, good and bad: dispatches from the front lines’, Science and Public Policy, 43(2), pp.226–244. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv035

Castañer, X. and Oliveira, N. (2020) ‘Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation among organisations: establishing the distinctive meanings of these terms through a systematic literature review’, Journal of Management, 46(6), pp.965–1001. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565

Crawford, R. (2022) Is it possible to measure collaboration? Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/news-and-views/it-possible-measure-collaboration (Accessed: 28 March 2024).

Davies, P. (2009) ‘Review and reward within the computerised peer‐assessment of essays’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), pp.321–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802071072

de la Fuente, J. (2020) ‘The exquisite corpse for the advance of science’, Arts et Sciences, 4, pp.1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21494/ISTE.OP.2020.0506

Dickerson, C., Jarvis, J. and Stockwell, L. (2016) ‘Staff–student collaboration: student learning from working together to enhance educational practice in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), pp.249–265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1136279

Enyedy, N. and Stevens, R. (2022) ‘Analyzing collaboration’, in R.K. Sawyer (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.196–216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888295.013

Freeman, R.E. (1993) ‘Collaboration, global perspectives, and teacher education’, Theory into Practice 32(1), pp.33–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543570

Freeth, R. and Caniglia, G. (2020) ‘Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research’, Sustainability Science, 15(1), pp.247–261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00701-z

Graesser, A.C., Fiore, S.M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P.W. and Hesse, F.W. (2018) ‘Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), pp.59−92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244

Kaner, S. (2014) Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making. 3rd edn. Newark: Wiley.

Light, A. and Boys, J. (2017) ‘Learning at/with/from the edges’, in B. DiSalvo, J. Yip, E. Bonsignore and C. DiSalvo (eds.) Participatory design for learning. New York: Routledge, pp.157–174. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630830

McKay, J. and Sridharan, B. (2023) ‘Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), pp.221–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677

Miller, A.K. (2015) Freedom to fail: how do I foster risk-taking and innovation in my classroom? Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD Arias. Available at: https://archive.org/details/freedomtofailhow0000mill (Accessed: 24 March 2024).

Neimanis, A. (2012) ‘On collaboration (for Barbara Godard)’, NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(3), pp.215–221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2012.703689

Newell, C. and Bain, A. (2019) ‘Academics’ perceptions of collaboration in higher education course design’, Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), pp.748–763. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1690431

O’Sullivan, R.G. (2012) ‘Collaborative evaluation within a framework of stakeholder-oriented evaluation approaches’, Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(4), pp.518–522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.005

Owusu-Agyeman, Y. and Moroeroe, E. (2021) ‘Professional community and student engagement in higher education: rethinking the contributions of professional staff’, Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(2), pp.126−143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-10-2020-0078

Pham, H. and Tanner, K. (2014) ‘Collaboration between academics and librarians: a literature review and framework for analysis’, Library Review, 631, pp.5−45 Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2013-0064

Reeves, S., Xyrichis, A. and Zwarenstein, M. (2017) ‘Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(1), pp.1–3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150

Robson, M. and Kitchen, S.S. (2007) ‘Exploring physiotherapy students’ experiences of interprofessional collaboration in the clinical setting: a critical incident study’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(1), pp.95–109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820601076560

Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Heard, J. and Ramalingam, D. (2020) Collaboration: skill development framework. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. Available at: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=ar_misc (Accessed: 12 March 2024).

Sindall, R.C. and Barrington, D.J. (2020) ‘Fail fast, fail forward, fail openly: the need to share failures in development’, Journal of Trial and Error, 1(1), pp.6–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36850/ed2

Sridharan, B., Tai, J. and Boud, D. (2019) ‘Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement?’, Higher Education, 77(5), pp.853–870. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0305-7

Sugrue, C., Englund, T., Solbrekke, T.D. and Fossland, T. (2017) ‘Trends in the practices of academic developers: trajectories of higher education?’, Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), pp.2336–2353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1326026

Thayer-Bacon, B.J. and Pack-Brown, S. (2000) ‘What is collaboration? Diverse perspectives’, Journal of Thought, 35(2), pp.45–58. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42589615

Tricio, J., Montt, J., Orsini, C., Gracia, B., Pampin, F., Quinteros, C., Salas, M., Soto, R. et al. (2019) ‘Student experiences of two small group learning‐teaching formats: seminar and fishbowl’, European Journal of Dental Education, 23(2), pp.151–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12414

Veles, N. (2022) Optimising the third space in higher education: case studies of intercultural and cross-boundary collaboration. London: Routledge. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003259527

Veles, N., Carter, M.A. and Boon, H. (2018) ‘Complex collaboration champions: university third space professionals working together across borders’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 75–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1428694

Wheeler, S., Passmore, J. and Gold, R. (2020) ‘All to play for: LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® and its impact on team cohesion, collaboration and psychological safety in organisational settings using a coaching approach’, Journal of Work-Applied Management, 12(2), pp.141–157. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-03-2020-0011

Whitchurch, C. (2008) ‘Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: the emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4) pp.377–396. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00387.x

Whitchurch, C. (2015) ‘The rise of third-space professionals: paradoxes and dilemmas’, in U. Teichler and W.C. Cummings (eds.) Recruiting and managing the academic profession—the changing academic profession in international comparative perspective, 14, Springer, Cham. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16080-1_5

Winstone, N., Nash, R.A., Parker, M. and Rowntree, J. (2016) ‘Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes’, Educational Psychologist, 52(1), pp.17–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Zanin-Yost, A. (2018) ‘Academic collaborations: linking the role of the liaison/embedded librarian to teaching and learning’, College and Undergraduate Libraries, 25, pp.150–163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1455548

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

How to Cite

Edgerley, R. and Crawford, R. (2025) “LEGO, fishbowls, and collaboration”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1219.

Issue

Section

Collaboration and partnerships