Giving ourselves the edge: capitalising on collaboration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1213Keywords:
third space professionals, knotworking, enrichmentAbstract
This paper considers the collaboration of academics and third-space professionals to create an enrichment programme in an English university. It briefly outlines the programme and explores student engagement and reaction to it before identifying tentative short-term outcomes associated with it: increases in self-reported self-confidence, academic, digital, professional, and leadership skills. The programme created space and time for academics and third-space professionals to come together, share their knowledge, and recognise each other’s expertise to manifest ‘knotworking’ (Veles, 2022). A project lead with experience of being an academic and a third-space professional helped to facilitate understanding and develop ‘ingroup’ features such as a sense of shared connection, co-operation, mutual help, and respect for each other. We conclude that an evolving framework of third-space professionals which is firmly part of the real institutional fabric leads to less reliance on project-based reinventions and instead fosters a steady rate of beneficial progress for the entire learning community.
References
Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Maier, S. and Sinfield, S. (2020), ‘Global university, local issues: taking a creative and humane approach to learning and teaching’, in E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger and M. Makhanya (eds) Improving classroom engagement and international development programs: international perspectives on humanizing higher education. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp.75−91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000027007
Aljohani, O. (2016) ‘A comprehensive review of the major studies and theoretical models of student retention in higher education’, Higher Education Studies, 6(2), pp.1−18. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n2p1
Buckley, P. and Lee, P. (2018) ‘The impact of extra-curricular activity on the student experience’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), pp.37−48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418808988
Clouder, L., Karakus, M., Cinotti, A., Ferreyra, M., Fierros, G. and Rojo, P. (2020) ‘Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis’, High Education, 80, pp.757–778. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6
Cotton, D., Nash, T. and Kneale, P. (2017) ‘Supporting the retention of non-traditional students in higher education using a resilience framework’, European Educational Research Journal, 16(1), pp.62−79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116652629
Crabtree, R. (2023) ‘Barriers to student engagement: why don’t university students engage?’, Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 4(3), pp.28–47. Available at: https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/1156 (Accessed: 5 November 2024).
de Main, L., Wakefield, L. and Holmes, H. (2022) Why won’t they engage in extra-curricular opportunities? Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/news-and-views/why-wont-they-engage-extra-curricular-opportunities (Accessed: 18 March 2024).
Dickinson, J., Griffiths, T-L. and Bredice, A. (2020) ‘“It’s just another thing to think about”: encouraging students’ engagement in extracurricular activities’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(6), pp.744−757. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1813263
Ehiyazaryan, E. and Barraclough, N. (2009) ‘Enhancing employability: integrating real-world experience in the curriculum’, Education + Training, 51(4), pp.292−308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910910964575
Eriksson, T., Adawi, T. and Stohr, C. (2017) ‘Time is the bottleneck: a qualitative study exploring why learners drop out of MOOCs’, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, pp.133−146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9127-8
Institute of Student Employers (2021) Student recruitment survey. London: ISE. Available at: https://ise.org.uk/page/ISEPublications (Accessed: 20 November 2024).
Le, H.V. (2024) ‘Factors impeding university students’ participation in English extracurricular activities: time constraints and personal obstacles’, Heliyon, 10(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27332
Little, D. and Green, D.A. (2021) ’Credibility in educational development: trustworthiness, expertise, and identification’, Higher Education Research and Development, 41(3), pp.804−819. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1871325
Lowe, T. (2023) ‘Embedding employability into the curriculum: five recommendations to improve widening participation students’ graduate employability’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (26). Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi26.925
McIntosh, E. and Nutt, D. (2022) ‘Blended professionals: how to make the most of “third space” experts’, Times Higher Education, 18 May. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/blended-professionals-how-make-most-third-space-experts (Accessed: 25 March 2024).
Shah, M. and Cheng, M. (2018) ‘Exploring factors impacting student engagement in open access courses’, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(2), pp.187−202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1508337
Stevenson, J., Clegg, S. and Lefever, R. (2010) ‘The discourse of widening participation and its critics: an institutional case study’, London Review of Education, 8(2), pp.105–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2010.487328
Tajfel, H. (1970) ‘Experiments in intergroup discrimination’, Scientific American, 223(5), pp.96−102. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/experiments-in-intergroup-discrimin/ (Accessed: 5 November 2024).
Veles, N. (2022) ‘Recommendations for universities and the conceptual framework of the university third space professional staff cross-boundary collaboration and collaborative capital optimisation’, in N. Veles (ed) Optimising the third space in higher education: case studies of intercultural and cross-boundary collaboration. London: Routledge, pp.150−195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003259527
Whitchurch, C. (2012) Reconstructing identities in higher education: the rise of ‘third space’ professionals. 1st edn. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098301
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).