Institutional responsibility and third space professionals: a call for structural change to embrace ambiguity

Authors

  • Evonne Irwin University of Melbourne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1209

Keywords:

third space professionals, institutional responsibility, critical dialogue, ambiguity

Abstract

Third space professionals have occupied ambiguous spaces in higher education hierarchies for decades. While this positioning can be fruitful and lead to creative solutions and responses for our institutions in challenging times, third space professionals, by and large, remain structurally marginalised, with limited or unclear access to rewards, recognition and career progression. These limitations can inhibit the volume of third space professionals’ voices in debates which challenge dominant understandings about traditional practices in the academy. Based on the findings from a PhD project on the identities and experiences of third space professionals in Australian higher education, I argue that resisting dominant discourses from the margins is a difficult endeavour requiring both the centre and margin to find a common language to engage in critical dialogue. With ambiguous and limited pathways for progression and recognition, third space professionals risk being unheard. Our institutions, therefore, have a responsibility to create formal (and perhaps temporary) classification-crossing opportunities for third space career progression and reward, leading to an amplification of the voices of third space professionals in critical dialogue about their positioning.

Author Biography

Evonne Irwin, University of Melbourne

Evonne Irwin is an Educational Designer with the Williams Centre for Learning Advancement in the Faculty of Business and Economics at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Her PhD explored the experiences of third space professionals in Australian higher education through a post-structuralist feminist lens. Evonne’s previous and current research is driven broadly by issues related to access and equity in higher education for both staff and students who experience marginalisation.

References

Ahmed, S. (1999) ‘“She’ll wake up one of these days and find she’s turned into a nigger”: passing through hybridity’. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(2), 87–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632769922050566

Bennett, A. (2012) The power paradox: a toolkit for analysing conflict and extremism. Maryland, USA: University Press of America.

Braidotti, R. (2011) Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press: New York.

Butler, J. (2009) ‘Performativity, precarity and sexual politics’, AIBR, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3), pp.i–xiii. Available at: https://aries.aibr.org/storage/antropologia/04v03/criticos/040301b.pdf (Accessed: 4 October 2024).

Foucault, M. (1975) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (trans, 1977, A. Sheridan). London: Penguin.

Hall, J. (2022) ‘Understanding and debating the third space’, in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds.) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 26–32.

hooks, b. (2015) Yearning: race, gender and cultural politics. Routledge: New York.

Irwin, E. (2024) Working within, without and between: identities, power/s and mis/recognitions of third space professionals in higher education. PhD thesis. The University of Newcastle, Australia. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1506655 (Accessed: 4 October 2024).

Quinsee, S. (2022) ‘Leadership in the third space’, in E. McIntosh and D. Nutt (eds) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. Oxon: Routledge, pp 33–39.

Veles, N., Graham, C. and Ovaska, C. (2023) ‘University professional staff roles, identities and spaces of interaction: systematic review of literature published in 2000-2020’, Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 7(2), pp.127–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2023.2193826

Weedon, C. (1997) ‘Discourse, power and resistance’, in C. Weedon Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. 2nd edn. Cambridge MA: Blackwell, pp. 104–131.

Whitchurch, C. (2008) Professional managers in UK higher education: preparing for complex futures (Final report). London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/professional-managers-uk-higher-education-preparing-complex-futures-final-report (Accessed: 1 November 2024).

Whitchurch, C. (2009) ‘The rise of the blended professional in higher education: a comparison between the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States’, Higher Education, 58(3), pp.407–418. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9202-4

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

How to Cite

Irwin, E. (2025) “Institutional responsibility and third space professionals: a call for structural change to embrace ambiguity”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1209.

Issue

Section

Careers and professional development