Portraying the role: Exploring support needs of Programme Leaders in HE through portraiture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi31.1202Keywords:
programme director, programme leader, academic leadership, distributed leadershipAbstract
Programme Leaders (PLs) in Higher Education (HE) hold a complex role that has responsibilities that link to external performance metrics. This role, existing outside of the traditional teaching/research view means it often lacks visibility and esteem (MacFarlane, 2007). How this influences role-holders’ understanding of the role, and how they can be better supported, is the focus of this study, following seven Undergraduate (UG) PLs over the course of the academic year 2020/21. Portraiture was used to capture the ‘complexity of human experience and organisational life’ (Lawrence-Lightfoot and Davis, 1997, xv). A cross-portrait analysis illuminated aspects of the organisational context that influenced PLs’ experiences. Findings from this study suggest that how PLs see themselves in the role influences their experiences. The absence of formal training and induction hinders role clarity and understanding of responsibilities, increasing PLs’ sense of personal accountability. PLs within academic schools with distributed leadership, where they were given autonomy, were better able to view themselves as leaders. This was augmented by a collaborative senior management team and opportunities to connect to other PLs. In hierarchical structures PLs seemed disempowered and had an absence of role understanding and autonomy. This study extends knowledge of the PL role and support needs, illuminating reasons for variances in practice seen in previous studies. It supports the need for culture change around this challenging but strategically important role, along with the importance of ensuring it is valued, and resourced, as the leadership role it is.
References
Aitken, G. and O’Carroll, S. (2020) ‘Academic identity and crossing boundaries: the role of the Programme Director in postgraduate taught programmes’, Higher Education Research and Development, 39(7), pp.1410-1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1737658.
Anderson, G. (2006) ‘Carving out time and space in the managerial university’, Journal of organizational change management, 19(5), pp.578-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610686698.
Bahn, S., and Barratt-Pugh, L. (2013) ‘Getting reticent young male participants to talk: using artefact-mediated interviews to promote discursive interaction’, Qualitative Social Work, 12(2), pp.186-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011420501.
Barry, W. (2023) ‘The role of ‘knowledgeable others’ in supporting academics’ professional learning: implications for academic development’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 27(1), pp.16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2022.2131650.
Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2008) ‘Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practice’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), pp.358–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00398.x.
Bolden, R., Petrov, G., and Gosling, J. (2009) ‘Distributed leadership in higher education: rhetoric and reality’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), pp.257-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100301.
Bolden, R., Jones, S., Davis, H. and Gentle, P. (2015) Developing and sustaining shared leadership in higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
Bottery, M., Man, P., Wright, N. and Ngai, G. (2009) ‘Portrait methodology and educational leadership: putting the person first’, International Studies in Educational Administration, 37(3), pp.82-86.
Bryman, A. (2008) ‘Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review’, Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), pp.693-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701685114.
Cahill, J., Bowyer, J., Rendell, C., Hammond, A. and Korek, S. (2015) ‘An exploration of how Programme Leaders in higher education can be prepared and supported to discharge their roles and responsibilities effectively’, Educational Research, 57(3), pp.272-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1056640.
Connolly, M., James, C. and Fertig, M. (2019) ‘The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 47(4), pp.504-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745880.
Cope, V., Jones, B and Hendricks, J. (2015) ‘Portraiture: a methodology through which success and positivity can be explored and reflected’, Nurse Researcher, 22(3), pp.6-12.
Ellis, C. and Berger, L. (2003) ‘Their story/my story/our story’, in Holstein, J. and Gubrium, J. (eds.) Inside interviewing; new lenses, new concerns. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.849-875.
Ellis, S. and Nimmo, A. (2018) ‘Opening eyes and changing mind-sets: professional development for Programme Leaders’, in Lawrence, J. and Ellis, S. (eds.), Supporting Programme Leaders and programme leadership SEDA Special 39. London: Staff and Educational Development Association, pp.35-39.
Fullan, M. (1991) The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
Goetz, J. and LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational
research. New York: Academic Press.
Guba, E. G. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation.
Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). ‘Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and
Emerging Confluences’. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage
handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage. Pp. 191–215.
Hayes, S. (2019) The labour of words in higher education: is it time to reoccupy policy? London: Brill Sense.
Kezar, A. (2006) ‘Redesigning for collaboration in learning initiatives: an examination of four highly collaborative campuses’, The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), pp.804-838. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0043.
Krause, K., Bath, D., Lizzio, A., Albert, L., Clark, J., Campbell, S., Fyffe, J., Scott, G. and Spencer, D. (2010) ‘Degree Programme Leader roles and identities in changing times’, Society for Research in Higher Education Annual Research Conference 2010, Newport, Wales 14-16 December. Available at: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/38879/69889_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed 25 January 2022).
Lave, J. (1993). ‘The practice of learning’, in: S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (Eds) Understanding
Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. pp. 3- 32.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, J., Morrell, L. J. and Scott, G. W. (2023) ‘Building a competence-based model for the academic development of programme leaders’, International Journal for Academic Development, pp. 1–14.
Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2023.2166942
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. and Hoffmann Davis, J. (1997) The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
MacFarlane, B. (2007) ‘Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: the implications for university promotions policy’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863.
Massie, R. (2018) ‘The programme director and the teaching excellence framework: how do we train the former to survive the latter?’, Higher Education Quarterly, 72(4), pp.332-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12169.
McCann, L., Hutchison, N. and Adair, A. (2022) ‘Calibration of stakeholder influence in the UK higher education sector’, Studies in Higher Education, 47(7), pp.1502-1523, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1916908.
Middlehurst, R., Goreham, H. and Woodfield, S. (2009) ‘Why research leadership in higher education? Exploring contributions from the UK's leadership foundation for higher education’, Leadership, 5(3), pp.311-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009337763.
Milburn, P. C. (2010) ‘The role of programme directors as academic leaders’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), pp.87-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410365653.
Mitchell, R. (2015) ‘“If there is a job description I don’t think I’ve read one”: a case study of Programme Leadership in a UK pre-1992 university’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(5), pp.713-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895302.
Murphy, M. and Curtis, W. (2013) ‘The micro-politics of micro-leadership: exploring the role of the programme leader in English universities’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), pp. 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727707.
Naylor, S (2022) Being an Effective Programme Leader in Higher Education : A Practical Guide, Taylor and Francis Group, Oxford.
Olssen, M. and Peters, M. A. (2005) ‘Neoliberalism, higher education, and the knowledge economy: from free market to knowledge capitalism’, Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), pp.313-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718.
Seidman, I. (2013) Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Teachers College Press: New York.
Senior, R. (2018) ‘The shape of programme leadership in the contemporary university’, in Lawrence, J. and Ellis, S. (eds.) Supporting programme leaders and programme leadership, SEDA Special 39. London: Staff and Educational Development Association, pp.11-14.
Spillane, J. D. (2006) Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass and Wiley.
Vilkinas, T. and Ladyshewsky, R. (2011) ‘Leadership behaviour and effectiveness of academic program directors in Australian universities’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40(1), pp.109-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211420613.
Youngs, H. (2017). ‘A critical exploration of collaborative and distributed leadership in higher education: developing an alternative ontology through leadership-as-practice’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(2), pp.140-154, https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276662
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).