Pedagogical content knowledge as a model for academic development practice in the third space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1195Keywords:
pedagogical content knowledge, third space, expertise, credibilityAbstract
In this opinion piece, I make the case for the use of Shulman’s concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge as both a practical and philosophical approach to academic development work in the third space. I argue that a PCK-like model allows for the development of relationships with academics that are grounded in mutual respect for one another’s expertise and are collaborative in nature and provides guidance for the scope of academic development work. I also argue that using PCK as a model can enhance the credibility of third space workers as we navigate the political and managerial environment of a higher education institution.
References
Barrow, M., and Grant, B. (2012) ‘The ‘truth’ of academic development: how did it get to be about “teaching and learning”?’ Higher Education Research and Development, 31(4), pp.465-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.602393.
Brogt, E. (2009) Pedagogical and curricular thinking of professional astronomers teaching the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram in introductory Astronomy courses for non-science majors. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Arizona.
Buissink, N., Diamond, P., Hallas, J., Swann, J., and Sciascia, A. D. (2017) ‘Challenging a measured university from an indigenous perspective: placing “manaaki” at the heart of our professional development programme’, Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), pp.569-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1288706.
Carter, K. (1990) ‘Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach’, in Houston, W. R. (ed.) Handbook on research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan, pp.291-310.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A. and King, R. A. (1993) ‘Pedagogical content knowing: an integrative model for teacher preparation’, Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), pp.263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487193044004004.
Debowski, S. (2011) ‘Locating academic development: the first step in evaluation’, in Stefani, L. (ed.) Evaluating the effectiveness of academic development: principles and practice. New York: Routledge, pp.17-30.
Doyle, W. (1992) ‘Curriculum and pedagogy’, in Jackson, P. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Macmillan, pp.486-516.
Harland, T., and Staniforth, D. (2008) ‘A family of strangers: the fragmented nature of academic development’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), pp.669-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802452392.
Green, D., and Little, D. (2016) ‘Family portrait: a profile of educational developers around the world’, International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), pp.135-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1046875.
Kotter, J. P. (2012) ‘Accelerate!’, Harvard Business Review, 90(11), pp.44-58.
Land, R. (2004) Educational development: discourse, identity and practice. New York: Open University Press.
Mårtensson, K., and Roxå, T. (2016) ‘Working with networks, microcultures and communities’, in Baume, D. and Popovic, C. (eds.) Advancing practice in academic development. London and New York: Routledge, pp.174-187.
Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. J. (2006) ‘Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge’, Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp.1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Shulman, L. S. (1986) ‘Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching’, Educational Researcher, 15(2), pp.4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.
Shulman, L. S. (1987) ‘Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform’, Harvard Educational Review, 57, pp.1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
Shulman, L. S. (2005) ‘Signature pedagogies in the professions’, Daedalus, 134(3), pp.52-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027998.
Sutherland, K. A. (2018) ‘Holistic academic development: is it time to think more broadly about the academic development project’, International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), pp.261-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1524571.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N. and De Vos, W. (1998) ‘Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge’, International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), pp.673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J.
Veles, N., Carter, M-A. and Boon, H. (2019) ‘Complex collaboration champions: university third space professionals working together across borders’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23(2-3), pp.75-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1428694.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Whitchurch, C. (2008) ‘Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: the emergence of third space professionals in UK Higher Education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), pp.377-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00387.x.
Whitchurch, C. (2010) ‘Convergence and divergence in professional identities’, in Gordon, G. and Whitchurch, C. (eds.) Academic and professional identities in higher education: the challenges of a diversifying workforce. New York: Routledge, pp.167-183.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
