Voices from the classroom: understanding students' perceptions of collaborative learning in computer-based spaces

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1184

Keywords:

group-level interactions, meaningful learning, knowledge transformative tool, student perceptions, effective learning triangle , ELT

Abstract

This study explores postgraduate students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of collaborative learning within computer-based environments. The research investigates the distinctions between collaborative learning and group work, examining how students’ attitudes and behaviours differ, and the subsequent impact on learning outcomes. Findings reveal that students can clearly distinguish between these two approaches. While both involve peer interactions, group work predominantly fosters employability skills such as teamwork and goal achievement, whereas collaborative learning enhances individual knowledge construction. The study introduces the Effective Learning Triangle (ELT), comprising three key core components: Facilitator, Environment, and Learning. In collaborative learning contexts, the facilitator plays a pivotal role in designing sessions that align intended learning outcomes with the learning environment. For example, flexible computer-based spaces emerge as conducive environments for promoting collaborative learning, particularly in technical disciplines. This paper highlights the significance of tailored facilitation and adaptable environments in fostering meaningful student engagement.

Author Biographies

Sakirulai Olufemi Isiaq, University of the Arts London

Olufemi Isiaq (Femi) is the Programme Director for the Computer and Data Science Programme at UAL's Creative Computing Institute. With nearly two decades of industry and academic experience, Femi specialises in Human-Environment Interactions (HEI). His innovative approach to education integrates mental wellbeing management into higher education curricula and pioneers new pedagogical methods for teaching, particularly computing and other technical subjects. Passionate about student engagement, Femi continually drives initiatives that foster inclusivity, creativity, and holistic learning experiences, making a lasting impact on both students and the academic community.

Louise Usher, Solent University Southampton

Louise Usher (Solent University Southampton, UK). As a Learning Designer, Dr Louise Usher takes a people-first approach when collaborating with academics and colleagues to address educational and pedagogical challenges. With diverse expertise in edtech, technology enhanced learning, learner analytics, and active learning pedagogies, she strives to deliver value and meaningful impact to projects, faculty, and learners navigating this evolving landscape of higher education. 

References

Asino, T.I. and Pulay, A. (2019) ‘Student perceptions on the role of the classroom environment on computer supported collaborative learning’, TechTrends, 63, pp.179-187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0353-y

Balasooriya, C., di Corpo, S. and Hawkins, N.J. (2010) ‘The facilitation of collaborative learning: what works?’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(2), pp.1-14.

Beeson, H. and Byles, R. (2020) ‘Creative solutions to common groupwork problems’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (19). Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi19.622

Bell, L. and Lygo-Baker, S. (2019) ‘Student-centred learning: a small-scale study of a peer-learning experience in undergraduate translation classes’, The Language Learning Journal, 47(3), pp.299-312.

Bemer, A.M., Moeller, R.M. and Ball, C.E. (2009) ‘Designing collaborative learning spaces’, Programmatic Perspectives, 1(2), pp.139-166.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999) ‘What do you mean by collaborative learning?’, in P. Dillenbourg (ed.) Collaborative-learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.1-19.

Duan, Z., Russell, I. and Jung, A. (2021) ‘Active learning strategies: a computing course for undergraduates’, 16th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE). Lancaster, United Kingdom, pp.301-306.

Freeman, L. and Greenacre, L. (2011) ‘An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work’, Journal of Marketing Education, 33(1), pp.5-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475310389150

Gamson, Z. F. (1994) ‘Collaborative learning comes of age’, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 26(5), pp.44-49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1994.10544652

He, S., Shi, X., Choi, T. and Zhai, J. (2023) ‘How do students' roles in collaborative learning affect collaborative problem-solving competency? A systematic review of research’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, article number 101423. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101423

Hunter, D. (2006) ‘Assessing collaborative learning’, British Journal of Music Education, 23(1), pp.75-89.

Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1999). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. 5th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (2013) ‘The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments on achievement’, in J. Hattie and E. Anderman (eds) International handbook of student achievement. New York: Routledge, pp.372-374.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. and Jochems, W. (2003) ‘Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research’, Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), pp.335-353.

Naicker, A., Singh, E. and van Genugten, T. (2022) ‘Collaborative online international learning (COIL): preparedness and experiences of South African students’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(5), pp.499-510.

Nyikos, M. and Hashimoto, R. (1997) ‘Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: in search of ZPD’, The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), pp.506-517.

Poort, I., Jansen, E. and Hofman, A. (2022) ‘Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education’, Higher Education Research and Development, 41(2), pp.511-526.

Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S. and Murphy, K. (2024) ‘How group structure, members' interactions and teacher facilitation explain the emergence of roles in collaborative learning’, Learning and Individual Differences, 112, article number 102463.

Shulman, L.S. and Shulman, J.H. (2004) ‘How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), pp.257-271.

Summers, M. and Volet, S. (2010) ‘Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports’, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, pp.473-492.

Tinto, V. (1997) ‘Classrooms as communities: exploring the educational character of student persistence’, Journal of Higher Education, 68, pp.599-623. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2959965

van Aalst, J. (2009) ‘Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses’, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, pp.259-287.

Wegerif, R. and Mercer, N. (1996) ‘Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom’, Language and Education, 10(1), pp.47-64.

Wilson, L., Ho, S. and Brookes, R.H. (2018) ‘Student perceptions of teamwork within assessment tasks in undergraduate science degrees’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), pp.786-799.

Zhang, Z. and Bayley, J.G. (2019) ‘Peer learning for university students' learning enrichment: perspectives of undergraduate students’, Journal of Peer Learning, 12(5), pp.61-74.

Downloads

Published

28-02-2025

How to Cite

Isiaq, S. O., & Usher, L. (2025). Voices from the classroom: understanding students’ perceptions of collaborative learning in computer-based spaces. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (34). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1184

Issue

Section

Papers