The use of a project management tool in distance education to enhance students’ engagement in group work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1146Keywords:
collaborative learning, group work, student engagement, online learning, higher education, trello, distance educationAbstract
Group work is a widely embraced learning and assessment method that holds considerable importance in both in-person and online settings in higher education. However, group assignments introduce distinctive challenges, including unequal contributions, team conflict and divergent work ethics, leading to a pervasive reluctance among students to engage in university-level group work. Despite these concerns, group work continues to be a vital assessment approach for students, equipping them with essential skills for professional environments that prioritise teamwork and collaboration. In this opinion piece, I explore students' reluctance to engage in group work and introduce strategies and tools to transform unproductive group work into a collaborative learning experience. The discussion outlines implications for academics and learning developers, contributing to the ongoing discourse on collaborative tools in higher education assessments. With a primary focus on the challenges faced by distance-learning students, the opinion piece delves into the potential of Trello, a collaborative project management tool, to address these challenges and enhance collaborative learning in distance education. Its purpose is threefold: (1) enhance academics’ understanding of students’ reluctance to engage in group work, (2) enrich the experience of distance-learning students by highlighting the multifaceted benefits of collaborative learning in their educational journey that extend beyond traditional classroom boundaries and (3) propose innovative solutions to educators for fostering a culture of collaboration for more effective group work.
References
Arao, B. and Clemens, K. (2013) ‘From safe spaces to brave spaces: a new way to frame dialogue around diversity and social justice’, in Landreman, L. (ed.) The art of effective facilitation: reflections from social justice educators. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, pp. 135–150.
Blowers, D.F. (2000) ‘Canada: the story of prior learning assessment and recognition’, in Evan, N. (ed.) Experiential learning around the world: employability and the global economy. London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 83–102.
Boling, E.C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H. and Stevens, M. (2012) ‘Cutting the distance in distance education: perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences’, Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), pp. 118–126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006.
Bouton, C. and Garth, R.Y. (1983) ‘Students in learning groups: active learning through conversation’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1983(14), pp. 73–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219831410.
Burke, A. (2011) ‘Group work: how to use groups effectively’, Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), pp. 87–95. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092109.pdf.
Chanda-Gool, S. and Mamas, C. (2017) ‘Coming from somewhere else: group engagement between students and academics’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i12.431.
Chang, B. and Kang, H. (2016) ‘Challenges facing group work online’, Distance Education, 37(1), pp. 73–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781.
Chapman, K.J., Meuter, M., Toy, D. and Wright, L. (2006)' ‘Can’t we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes’, Journal of Management Education, 30(4), pp. 557–569. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905284872.
Chiriac, E.H. (2014) ‘Group work as an incentive for learning students experiences of group work’, Frontiers in Psychology, 5(558), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558.
Corradi, H.R. (2021) ‘Does Zoom allow for efficient and meaningful group work? Translating staff development for online delivery during Covid-19’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 22(22). Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi22.697.
Davis, B.G. (1993) Tools for teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Fearon, C., McLaughlin, H. and Yoke Eng, T. (2012) ‘Using student group work in higher education to emulate professional communities of practice’, Education + Training, 54(2/3), pp. 114–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210233.
Gaudet, A.D., Ramer, L.M., Nakonechny, J., Cragg, J.J. and Ramer, M.S. (2010) ‘Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work’, PLOS ONE, 5(12), p. e15821. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015821.
Hilton, S. and Phillips, F. (2010) ‘Instructor-assigned and student-selected groups: a view from inside’, Issues in Accounting Education, 25(1), pp. 15–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2010.25.1.15.
Jaques, G. (2000) Learning in groups. London: Routledge.
Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (2009) ‘An educational psychology success story: social interdependence theory and cooperative learning’, Educational Researcher, 38(5), pp. 365–379. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057.
Jones, K. (2021) ‘“We had a good laugh together”: using Teams for collaborative learning’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 21(21). Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi21.810.
Jorczak, R.L. (2011) ‘An information processing perspective on divergence and convergence in collaborative learning’. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), pp. 207–221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9104-6.
Kirkwood, A. and Price, L. (2014) ‘Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review’, Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), pp.6-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
Koppenborg, M. and Klingsieck, K.B. (2022) ‘Group work and student procrastination’, Learning and Individual Differences, 94, p. 102117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102117.
Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Felipe-Castaño, E., Polo-del-Río, M.I. and Iglesias-Gallego, D. (2018) ‘Cooperative team learning and the development of social skills in higher education: the variables involved’, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1536. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01536.
Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F. and Street, B. (2008) ‘Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning’, Educational Psychology, 28(1), pp. 47–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701413746.
Russell, M. (2010) ‘The formation of effective work groups within an FE classroom’, Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(2), pp. 205–221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13596741003790765.
Salmons, J. (2019) Learning to collaborate, collaborating to learn: engaging students in the classroom and online (First ed.). Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445708.
Slavin, R.E. (1980) ‘Cooperative learning’, Review of Educational Research, 50(2), pp. 315–342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315.
Smith, G.G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A.J., Caris, M. and Martinez, C.D. (2011) ‘Overcoming student resistance to group work: online versus face-to-face’, The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), pp. 121–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005.
Springer, L., Stanne, M.E. and Donovan, S.S. (1999) ‘Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis’, Review of Educational Research, 69(1), pp. 21–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021.
Tseng, H.W. and Yeh, H.T. (2013) ‘Team members’ perceptions of online teamwork learning experiences and building teamwork trust: a qualitative study’, Computers and Education, 63, pp. 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.013.
Vance, K., Kulturel-Konak, S. and Konak, A. (2015) ‘Teamwork efficacy and attitude differences between online and face-to-face students’, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Integrated Stem Education Conference, Princeton, NJ, USA 7 March (pp. 246–251).
Wentzel, K.R. and Watkins, D.E. (2002) ‘Peer relationships and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers’, School Psychology Review, 31(3), pp. 366–377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086161.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
