Unlikely allies: ChatGPT and higher education assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1136

Keywords:

generative AI, knowledge, assessment design, learning, intertextuality

Abstract

In the context of higher education, the emergence and spread of generative AI, including Large  Language Models (LLMs), is revolutionising our relationship with knowledge. From spell-check and formatting tasks to rapid literature reviews, all forms of written assessments and even assessment feedback can be produced at the click of a button. We could understandably marvel at this new technology as an equaliser (at least, for those who have access to it).  Second-language learners can write with native fluency. Non-traditional learners can overcome casual discrimination and academic elitism. Working class and mature learners can transition back into higher education. All this without recourse to pernicious ‘essay mills’. Yet, what of assessment? If Generative AI writes submissions for students and then marks them for lecturers, is the assessment dead? If so, what will become of learning developers - are their roles also dead, joining both assessment and the lecture in the academic afterlife? In this opinion piece we acknowledge those concerns but balance them with a message of hope. Generative AI and learning development may seem unlikely allies but there is still time to forge an alliance in the name of impactful learning and we conclude with three recommendations on how this might be achieved.

Author Biographies

Constantine Manolchev, University of Exeter

Constantine Manolchev is a Senior Lecturer in Sustainable Futures and Programme Director for BSc Business (Penryn). He studies ethical organisational infrastructures, specialising in precarious work, bullying and harassment, and place-based, circular systems. In his pedagogic research, Constantine explores the use of generative AI in learning development. 

Ryan Nolan, University of Exeter

Ryan Nolan is a Research Impact Fellow in the UKRI Circular Economy Hub. His research is concerned with the theory and practice of boundary-crossing collaboration to drive sustainability transitions, with a specific focus on the circular economy.

Eleanor Hodgson, University of Exeter

Eleanor Hodgson is the Director of Exeter’s ASPIRE Professional Recognition Pathway through which Exeter academics gain HEA fellowship. She is a Senior Educator Developer, working on sharing, developing, and enhancing education practice.

References

Adeshola, I. and Adeola Praise Adepoju, A.P. (2023) ‘The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education’, Interactive Learning Environments.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858.

Dempere J., Modugu K., Hesham A. and Ramasamy, L.K. (2023) ‘The impact of ChatGPT on higher education’, Front. Educ. 8, 1206936.

https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936.

Elbanna, S. and Armstrong, L. (2024) ‘Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future’, Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), pp.16-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-03-2023-0016.

Hu, K. (2023) ‘ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base’. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/ (Accessed: 5 October 2023).

Kristeva, J. (1986) The Kristeva reader. New York: Columbia University Press.

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., and Pechenkina, E. (2023) ‘Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators’, The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.

Lo, C.K. (2023) ‘What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature’, Education Sciences, 3(4), p.410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410.

Manolchev, C., Alexander, A. and Cherrington, R. (2022) ‘Towards “employability 3.0”: from practice to praxis’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Issue 24, September, pp.1-13. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.874.

Mason, J. (2019) Intertextuality in practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Open Culture (2023) ‘Noam Chomsky on ChatGPT’, Open Culture, 10 February. Available at: https://www.openculture.com/2023/02/noam-chomsky-on-chatgpt.html (Accessed: 5 October 2023).

Pichai, S. (2023) ‘An important next step on our AI journey’. Google, 6 February. Available at: https://blog.google/technology/ai/bard-google-ai-search-updates/ (Accessed: 5 October 2023).

Pradana, M. and Elisa, H.P. (2023) ‘Metaverse in education: a systematic literature review’, Cogent Social Sciences 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2252656.

Ray, P. P. (2023) ‘ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope’, Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, pp.121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.

Saetra, H. S. (2023) ‘Generative AI: here to stay, but for good?’, Technology in Society, 102372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102372.

Downloads

Published

27-03-2024

How to Cite

Manolchev, C., Nolan, R. and Hodgson, E. (2024) “Unlikely allies: ChatGPT and higher education assessment”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (30). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1136.

Issue

Section

Opinion Pieces