Helping students to learn how to critically evaluate a source: how effective are the tools we use?
Keywords:critical thinking, evaluating a source, learning resources, generic support
What does evaluating a source involve? What aspects of the source are being evaluated? On what basis do we determine a source’s strengths and weaknesses? And how do we explain this to students who are learning the basics of critical analysis?
The Study Advice team at the University of Reading recently developed a new online guide introducing students to critical analysis. The guide includes a selection of exercises and visual and mnemonic tools that cover the basics of critical analysis, including Bloom’s Taxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001), the Seven Pillars of Information Literacy (SCONUL, 2011), C.R.A.A.P. (Blakeslee, 2004), B.E.A.M. (Bizup, 2008), and the University of Plymouth’s (2006) Model to Generate Critical Thinking, along with a new resource called S.P.E.A.R. that focuses on how to analyse and evaluate an individual source. We developed the latter after noticing in one-to-one appointments that students appeared to find this aspect of critical analysis particularly difficult to understand. Moreover, we felt that existing tools like C.R.A.A.P. and the Seven Pillars did not provide enough clarification of how to identify a source’s strengths and weaknesses.
In this workshop, participants will consider how well these tools work in helping students understand how to evaluate a source’s analysis and, by extension, its claims. This process can differ significantly across the disciplines. As such, we will also explore how to better capture the full breadth of critical analysis at degree level, without overwhelming students who are new to the concept with its full complexities.
Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., (eds.) (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Butler, W. D., Sargent, A. and Smith, K. (2023) The SIFT Method, Introduction to College Research. Available at: https://oer.pressbooks.pub/collegeresearch/chapter/the-sift-method/ (Accessed: 8 October 2023)
Bizup, J. (2008) ‘BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing’, Rhetoric Review, 27(1), pp. 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190701738858
Blakeslee, S. (2004) ‘The CRAAP Test’, LOEX Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 6-7. Available at: https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4 (Accessed: 13 January 2023)
Fielding, J. A. (2019) ‘Rethinking CRAAP: getting students thinking like fact-checkers in evaluating web sources’, College & Research Libraries News, 80(11), p. 620-622. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.80.11.620
Lea, M. and Street, B. (1998) ‘Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’, Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), pp. 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lea, M. and Street, B. (2006) ‘The "Academic Literacies" model: theory and applications’, Theory into Practice, 45(4), pp. 368-377. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40071622 (Accessed: 8 October 2023)
SCONUL. (2011) The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: core model. Available at: https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf (Accessed: 13 January 2023).
Thonney, T. and Montgomery, J. C. (2019) ‘Defining critical thinking across disciplines: an analysis of community college faculty perspectives’, College Teaching, 67(3), pp. 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579700
University of Plymouth (2006) Model to generate critical thinking. Available at: https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/1/1713/Model_To_Generate_Critical_Thinking.pdf (Accessed: 13 January 2023)
University of Reading (2023) Critical analysis: thinking, reading and writing. Available at: https://libguides.reading.ac.uk/critical-analysis/reading (Accessed: 1 September 2023)
Webster, H. (2019) The Three Domains of Critical Reading, LearnHigher. Available at: https://aldinhe.ac.uk/product/learnhigher-resources/the-three-domains-of-critical-reading/ (Accessed: 1 September 2023)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).