Mitigating writing anxiety through creative practices and community building
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1775Keywords:
creative activities, writing anxiety, academic community, sense of belongingAbstract
Writing anxiety has been documented to have an inverse relationship with students’ self-efficacy (Huerta et al., 2016). At the University of Southampton, the authors have devised a set of highly creative and practical steps to help students break the negative cycle of anxiety, negative feedback, and unrealised writing potential.
Apprehension around academic writing is a well-established and complex phenomenon that has been shown to negatively impact students in a variety of ways throughout their learning (Daly and Miller, 1985; Calimag, 2021; Mitchell et al., 2023). Furthermore, negative experiences of the writing process and feedback on writing often compound and exacerbate these anxieties in students’ cognitive, social, and behavioural abilities (Bastug et al., 2017; Mercer and Gulseren, 2024). To ameliorate what often becomes a negative cycle of anxiety and stress around academic writing, educators can offer creative and meaningful practices that are easily adaptable to a variety of educational contexts and content (Bandura, 1977; Mitchell et al., 2021).
Some of these innovative practices were demonstrated during this session at ALDcon25. In this interactive workshop, Learning Developers (LDers) had the opportunity to try out a variety of creative practices designed to reduce apprehension and anxiety around academic writing whilst simultaneously building students’ self-efficacy and developing positive learning communities. The workshop aligned with the ‘LDers and Inclusive LD’ sub-theme, showcasing activities that can be adapted to meet the needs of a diverse range of learners.
The activities explored in this workshop were also designed to promote positive learning environments (Advance HE, 2025) that foster a sense of community and belonging (Jury et al., 2017; Abegglen et al., 2021). Participants were required to engage fully with the activities and with each other in order to maximise the value from the session and to take away a bank of useful, replicable ideas.
In the wider context and with reference to ongoing work with specific awarding gap populations, the authors’ writing practices within the Widening Participation and Social Mobility Directorate at the University of Southampton look to explore and build upon the existing body of research that links the above outcomes with increased student achievement (Hadden et al., 2020; Wong et al., 2021; Andrews et al., 2023).
References
Abegglen, S., Burns, T. and Sinfield, S. (2021) Supporting student writing and other modes of learning and assessment: a staff guide. Calgary: PRISM Open Access.
Advance HE (2025) Building belonging: online. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/consultancy-and-enhancement/change-impact-programmes/building-belonging (Accessed: 8 September 2024).
Andrews, S., Stephenson, J., Adefila, A., Cuthbert, K., Lee, S., Dodd, V. and Jones-Devitt, S. (2023) ‘Approaches to addressing the ethnicity degree awarding gap: contextualising the landscape and developing a typology’, Transforming Access and Student Outcomes (TASO). Available at: https://taso.org.uk/libraryitem/report-approaches-to-addressing-the-ethnicity-degree-awarding-gap/ (Accessed: 8 January 2025).
Bandura, A (1977) ‘Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change’, Psychological Review 84(2), pp.191-215.
Bastug, M., Ertem, I.S. and Keskin, H.K. (2017) ‘A phenomenological research study on writer’s block: causes, processes, and results’, Education + Training, 59(6), pp.605-618. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2016-0169
Calimag, M.M.P. (2021) ‘Surfacing anger and anxiety in graduate research writing: a prose poetic journey’, Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas, 5(2), pp.675-686. Available at https://doi.org/10.35460/2546-1621.2021-0158
Daly, J.A. and Miller, M.D. (1975) ‘The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension’, Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), pp.242-249. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40170632 (Accessed: 8 January 2025).
Hadden, I.R., Easterbrook, M.J., Nieuwenhuis, M., Fox, K.J. and Dolan, P. (2020) ‘Self-affirmation reduces the socioeconomic attainment gap in schools in in England’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), pp.517-536.
Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M. and Chlup, D. (2016) ‘Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence’, Higher Education Research and Development, 36(4), pp.716-729. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
Jury, M., Smeding, A., Stephens, N.M., Nelson, J.E., Aelenei, C. and Darnon, C. (2017) ‘The experience of low-SES students in higher education: psychological barriers to success and interventions to reduce social-class inequality’, Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), pp.23-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12202
Mercer, M. and Gulseren, D.B. (2023) ‘When negative feedback harms: a systematic review of the unintended consequences of negative feedback on psychological, attitudinal, and behavioral responses’, Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), pp.654-669.
Mitchell, K.M., McMillan, D.E., Lobchuk, M.M., Nickel, N.C., Rabbani, R. and Li, J. (2021) ‘Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES)’, Assessing Writing, 48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524
Mitchell, K.M., Zumbrunn, S., Berry, D. and Demczuk, L. (2023) ‘Writing self-efficacy in postsecondary students: a scoping review’, Educational Psychology Review, 35, article number 82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09798-2
Wong, I.B., ElMorally, R. and Copsey-Blake, M. (2021) ‘”Fair and Square”: what do students think about the ethnicity degree awarding gap?’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), pp.1147-1161.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).