Academic literacies: learning developers’ perspectives on informing the curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1760Keywords:
academic literacies, learning developers, curricula, collaborationAbstract
This paper sets out the findings of a research project that explores how learning developers (LDers) translate academic literacies (AL) into practice for student learning (Lea and Street, 1998; Hilsdon, 2011; Hilsdon et al., 2019; Bassett and McNaught, 2024) through curriculum design and content creation. The findings reveal varied practice informed by each LDer’s theoretical foundations, wider debates within learning development, and local conditions within each participant’s university.
A key emergent theme is that participants seek to influence the design of new and existing curriculum and resources by actively reaching out to colleagues, often from the ‘ground up’. Through interactions of sharing, persuasion, and collaboration, LDers are attempting to integrate multiple forms of academic knowledge and skills into wide-ranging courses so all students can fully participate and succeed in their disciplines. However, the participants’ reflections reveal structural and individual factors within higher education that manifest as challenges and affordances for informing curricula, content, and resources. The research reveals some unexpected results about how LDers engage with AL in their own practice and their relationships with discipline-based colleagues to promote and develop inclusive curricula (OfS, 2024).
This paper uses the words of LDers across multiple disciplines and universities to share insights into how we seek to influence accessibility, equity, and inclusivity throughout students’ learning journeys. Participants will be invited to reflect on the findings and consider how they might inform their own strategies for their contexts.
References
Bassett, M. and McNaught, L. (2024) ‘Embedded approaches to academic literacy development: a systematic review of empirical research about impact’, Teaching in Higher Education, 30(5), pp.1065-1083. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2354280
Hilsdon, J. (2011) ‘What is learning development?’, in P. Hartley, J. Hilsdon, C. Keenan, S. Sinfield and M. Verity (eds) Learning development in higher education. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.13-27.
Hilsdon, J., Malone, C. and Syska, A. (2019) ‘Academic literacies twenty years on: a community-sourced literature review’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15, pp.1-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.567
Lea, M.R. and Street, B.V. (1998) ‘Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’, Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), pp.157-172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Office for Students (2024) ‘Risk 6: insufficient academic support’, 18 January. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-providers/equality-of-opportunity/equality-of-opportunity-risk-register/risk-6-insufficient-academic-support/ (Accessed: 9 January 2025).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).