Fostering staff engagement in investigating practice: A journey through pedagogic research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1749Keywords:
pedagogic research, teachers as researchers, professional development, higher education, Hong KongAbstract
Curriculum design, pedagogy, assessment, academic support, technology integration, and professional development (PD) are important aspects of learning development. Some learning developers have great ideas but may hesitate to put them into practice. Others might have experimented with their innovative ideas but are unsure if such practice should be continued. These imagined scenarios highlight a common yet fundamental question: Will my practice work? Or has my practice been effective? It can be elusive to determine the extent to which what is effective, under what circumstances, and for whom (Lin and Lam, 2025b). Therefore, developing research-informed practice becomes necessary to clarify important issues, spark conversation, promote change, and ultimately enhance the process of student learning (Nisbet, 1974; Stenhouse, 1975).
This presentation outlined two teaching and learning projects that support learning developers, specifically targeting academic staff across disciplines, to engage in pedagogic research at a university in Hong Kong (Lin and Lam, 2024). The projects initiate a range of PD support, encapsulated as ‘The Octopus’, to cater to teachers with various pedagogic research needs (Lin and Lam, 2025a). Examples of support include workshops, sharing sessions, and periodic consultations. Drawing from a larger study examining staff involvement in researching practice, this presentation highlighted three perceived learning development needs collected from 105 survey responses. Using reflexive thematic analysis to examine an open-ended question (Braun and Clarke, 2019), we identified the needs for scaffolding, knowledge exchange, and opportunities for networking and collaboration. Based on these needs, the team subsequently expanded its PD support to organise writing retreats and pilot scaffolded PD workshops that consist of pre-workshop reading groups, main workshops, and post-workshop group consultations. We also work on international partnership to bring in global perspectives. The presentation concluded by discussing the value of pedagogic research, operational challenges, and possible solutions regarding how to address diverse needs.
References
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2019) ‘Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis’, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), pp.589-597. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Boyer, E. L. (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
George, J. W., and Cowan, J. (1999) A handbook of techniques for formative evaluation: mapping the student’s learning experience. London: Kogan Page.
Hoon, A., Oliver, E., Szpakowska, K., and Newton, P. (2015) ‘Use of the ‘Stop, Start, Continue’ method is associated with the production of constructive qualitative feedback by students in higher education’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), pp.755-767. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956282
Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Jonen, A., Vehmeyer, J. and Möller, K. (2016) ‘The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), pp.21-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000041
Lin, V. and Lam, P. (2024) ‘Dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s: operationalising a teaching and learning community of practice’, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Research in Education. Cambridge UK 7-9 June, 1(1), pp.12-21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33422/educationconf.v1i1.365
Lin, V., and Lam, P. (2025a) ‘A suite of pedagogic research support: The Octopus’, British Educational Research Association. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/a-suite-of-pedagogic-research-support-the-octopus (Accessed: 28 June 2025).
Lin, V. and Lam, P. (2025b) ‘Weaving pedagogic research into teaching: is pedagogic research optional or essential in higher education?’, The Curriculum Journal, 36, pp.340-343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.323
Nisbet, J. (1974, April) ‘Educational research: the state of the art’, Proceedings of the inaugural meeting of the British Educational Research Association, pp.1-13. Available at: http://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/1974-Inaugural-conference-proceedings.pdf (Accessed: 28 June 2025).
Stenhouse, L. (1975) An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).