Using Design Thinking for Learning Development: problem-solving and authentic student co-creation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1735

Keywords:

design thinking, learning development, service design, student partnership, creativity

Abstract

This practical workshop engaged participants in Design Thinking (DT), a creative approach to problem-solving (Liedtka, 2018; Panke, 2019) that can be utilised for authentic student co-creation in Learning Development. In the same way that Henry Ford said his customers would ask for a faster horse, when we engaged with students, they often asked for more appointments, more workshops, and more support topics. Even when we set out to co-create, their ‘ask’ often remained within the frame of what we already did. The workshop explored how we could involve our stakeholders (students, academics, professional services) in a way that genuinely drew upon their varied experiences to help us make things better for everyone.

Creative approaches are already well-established in Learning Development as a tool for inclusive and engaging support (James, 2013; Sheridan, 2020; Abegglen et al., 2023). In this workshop, we supported participants in drawing upon creative approaches in DT to get to the right questions for their design needs. There is great potential to use creative expertise in the design of activities, workshops, appointments, and even the whole institutional Learning Development service(s). The workshop supported participants in using a radically different approach to design, working with stakeholders to use big thinking, creative ideation, and prototyping to deliver workable solutions.

As established in our JLDHE article (Fallin and Turton, 2025), DT poses significant potential to support Learning Developers in their partnership with students and staff. With origins in design and business, DT provides a substantial toolbox of approaches and strategies that decentre existing narratives and open the floor to new ways of thinking (Liedtka, 2018; Quintanilla et al., 2018; Panke, 2019). This workshop gave participants hands-on experience with some of these tools and an opportunity to reflect on how they could be used in inclusive Learning Development practice.

Author Biographies

Catherine Turton, Southampton Solent University

Catherine Turton is a Learning Designer at Southampton Solent University, whose practice is informed by the Learning Development community. Catherine integrates Learning Development literature and perspectives into her support of course teams. Catherine is always looking for ways to further her understanding of the accessibility needs of students and improve the digital accessibility of learning content.

Lee Fallin, University of Hull

Lee Fallin is a Lecturer in Education at the University of Hull with specialism across academic, artificial intelligence, data, digital, and visual literacies. His research interests focus on inclusion, digital education, and the intersections between education and geography, inclusive of physical and digital spaces. Lee has a background in Learning Development, having worked as an academic and Library Specialist for a decade.

References

Abegglen, S., Kamal, S., Burns, T., Akhbari, M. and Sinfield, S. (2023) ‘(Re)imagining higher education: an inspirational guide for academics’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 29, pp.1-8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi29.1099

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L. and Moore-Cherry, N. (2016) ‘Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships’, Higher Education, 71(2), pp.195-208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4

Fallin, L. and Turton, C. (2025) ‘The transformative potential of Design Thinking in Learning Development’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 34, pp.1-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1314

IDEO (2015) The field guide to human-centered design. Canada: Design Kit.

James, A. R. (2013) ‘Lego Serious Play: a three-dimensional approach to learning development’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 6, pp.1-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i6.208

Liedtka, J. (2018) ‘Why Design Thinking works’, Harvard Business Review, (September-October), pp.72-79.

Panke, S. (2019) ‘Design Thinking in education: perspectives, opportunities and challenges’, Open Education Studies, 1(1), pp.281-306. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022

Quintanilla, S. G., Chiluiza, K., Everaert, P. and Valcke, M. (2018) ‘Design Thinking in higher education: a scoping review’, 11th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain 12-14 November. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.1663

Rossi, V. (2023) Inclusive learning design in higher education: a practical guide to creating equitable learning experiences. Abingdon: Routledge.

Sheridan, N. (2020) ‘A two-step model for creative teaching in higher education’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 18, pp.1-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi18.574

Downloads

Published

30-09-2025

How to Cite

Turton, C., & Fallin, L. (2025). Using Design Thinking for Learning Development: problem-solving and authentic student co-creation. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (37). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1735