Exploring the relationship between theology and learning through the lens of disruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1730Keywords:
theological pedagogy, disruptive-inclusion, learning methodologies, dialogueAbstract
As in many other contexts, for theological education practitioners, successful teaching and learning outcomes not only include students’ clear comprehension of curriculum content but also the cultivation of skills to contextualise learning in multiple, unforeseen circumstances. In other words, academic achievement and personal/spiritual formation are inseparable. My research suggests that disruptive pedagogies (whether related to what is taught or how) are a foundational pedagogical tool that not only equip students to gain and understand new information but skills learners in practising the imaginative posture required to use their learning in real world situations. Against a larger backdrop, this conversation will explore: (a) The pedagogical and sociological factors implicated in (what I call) disruptive-inclusive learning, (b) How my work concerning the nature of the relationship between theology and pedagogy could contribute to a wider framework for considering the learning methodologies and methods indicated by a range of subject disciplines, and (c.) how such discussions, in turn, may lead to richer, more holistic and integrated approaches to LD more generally.
- What are the biggest challenges in developing a dialogue between the how and the what of teaching and learning (i.e. curriculum content and T&L methodologies/ methods)?
- What categories of learning disruption are specifically associated with different subject areas? As learning practitioners, do we equip learners to embrace or avoid these disruptions?
- Did we/ what did we learn from the pandemic about operating in and preparing for the unknown and unforeseeable? What might the next phase of this be?
References
Lillis, T. (2003) ‘Student writing as “academic literacies”: drawing on Bakhtin to move from “critique” to “design”’, Language and Education, 17(3), pp.192-207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848
Smith, J. (2024) Disruptive Inclusion: Why and How Christian Adult Learning is For Everyone. London, UK: SCM Press.
Syska, A., and Buckley, C. (eds) (2024) How to Be a Learning Developer in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, Community and Practice. Abingdon; New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003433347
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).