Student empowerment and development through note-taking in one-to-one sessions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi37.1711Keywords:
student empowerment, case notes, note-taking, one-to-one sessions, inclusivityAbstract
This study was prompted by a senior management request at the authors’ university to change record keeping practices. What followed was an exploration of the theoretical foundations that underpin the authors’ underlying philosophy on case notes as a means for advancing student empowerment.
Findings revealed that through the application of reflective practice, case notes could enhance student empowerment and development. Without reflection, however, case notes were more likely to follow the medical model in which they were ‘norm referenced and deficit driven’ (Cheek and Rudge, 1994, p.42). Co-authored, cloud-based case notes had the power to embody the ‘person-centred, emancipatory values’ (Webster, 2023, p.2) espoused by ALDinHE and ICALLD partner organisations such as AALL. These case notes were found to have changed the dynamic between student and learning developer; students had greater agency both during and after the session to interpret, adapt, and reflect upon their experiences. The new practices enhanced inclusivity by emphasising a strengths-based approach and by reducing students’ cognitive and emotional barriers.
The ALDcon25 workshop explored how expanded notions of accessibility, equity, and inclusivity could change practices in one-to-one (1-2-1) sessions. Drawing upon the theories of self-regulated learning (Chickering and Reisser, 1993; Zimmerman, 2015) and critical pedagogy (Freire, 2018) that inform the authors’ practices, the session shared key elements of literature review, survey results, and findings on case note practices. An interesting highlight was the intersections and disjunctions between theory and practice. Participants were encouraged to discuss best practices to enhance student empowerment during the session with a view to leave with tangible ideas to implement in their respective work.
References
Cheek, J. and Rudge, T. (1994) ‘Webs of documentation: the discourse of case notes’, Australian Journal of Communication, 21(2), pp.41-52.
Chickering A.W. and Reisser, L. (1993) Education and identity. 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Freire, P. (2018) Pedagogy of the oppressed. 4th edn. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Iordanou, C., Hawley, R. and Iordanou, I. (2023) ‘Ethical issues in note taking and record keeping in coaching’, in W.A. Smith, J. Passmore, E. Turner, Y.-L. Lai and D. Clutterbuck (eds) The Ethical Coaches’ Handbook. 1st edn. [Online] Routledge, pp.167-181.
Webster, H. (2023) ‘The five Ps of LD: using formulation in learning development work for a student-centred approach to “study skills”’, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(4), pp.1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.4.07
Zimmerman, B. (2015) ‘Self-regulated learning: theories, measures, and outcomes’, in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn. Elsevier, pp.541-546. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26060-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).