Student perceptions of object-based learning

Authors

  • Angela Newton University of Leeds

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi38.1619

Keywords:

experiential learning, object-based learning, pedagogy, sociology

Abstract

Since returning to face-to-face teaching post COVID-19, UK higher education has needed to adjust to significant challenges, including the acceleration of the role that GenAI and personal screens have in the student experience.  Whilst screens now mediate the learning experience to a large degree, we have turned to the materiality of object-based learning (OBL) as a multisensory, experiential pedagogy with the potential to stimulate criticality and build confidence in in-person communications amongst taught students. 

 

This paper details a research project into student perceptions and experiences of OBL at the University of Leeds.  Taught students participated in experimental OBL workshops and then reported their experiences in a questionnaire.  Participants were overwhelmingly positive about taking part in OBL workshops, particularly in relation to working with others, engaging with materiality, using their skills of analysis and interpretation and the active nature of learning in this context. OBL requires a classroom dynamic in which academic staff facilitate and guide discussion, rather than conforming to traditional didactic patterns of teaching.  

Students of Sociology and Social Policy taking part in the study saw the direct relevance of the objects under discussion to their disciplinary area, and the results of this study are assisting the school in strategically implementing OBL within the curriculum, specifically in a new module for third year undergraduate students, The Sociology of Objects.  

Author Biography

Angela Newton, University of Leeds

Angela Newton is a Learning Advisor in the Leeds University Library Learning Development Team and a member of the advisory board of the Centre for Disability Studies Archive. Her career has encompassed interests in transition to university, information literacy, student-centred learning, object-based learning and reclaiming the power of deep, long-form reading. Her blog, The Mid-Career Blog is a space for reflection and deep thinking: https://midcareer433389888.wordpress.com/

References

Andres, L. (2012) Designing and Doing Survey Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Campbell, T. and Newton, A. (2024) ‘Teaching with objects in Sociology and Social Policy’, Teaching with objects. Available at: https://teachingwithobjects.org/articles/teaching-with-objects-in-sociology-and-social-policy (Accessed: 22 May 2025).

Chickering, A. and Gamson, Z. (1987) ‘Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education’, AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), pp.3–7. Available at: https://www.lonestar.edu/multimedia/sevenprinciples.pdf (Accessed: 17 November 2025).

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2018) Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

Corita. (2025) Corita. Available at: https://www.corita.org/ (Accessed: 15 April 2025).

Dewey, J. (1967) The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fay, M. and Skipper, Y. (2022) ‘“I was able to ask for help when I became stressed rather than sitting alone and struggling”: psychology and law students’ views of the impact of identity and community on mental wellbeing’, Law Teacher, 56(1), pp.20–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2020507

Grafe, M. (2021) ‘Treating the digital disease: the role of digital and physical primary sources in undergraduate teaching.’ RBM : A journal of rare books, manuscripts, and cultural heritage, 22(1), pp.25–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5860/rbm.22.1.25

Kingery, W. D. (1996) Learning from things : method and theory of material culture studies. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Kukhareva, M., Lawrence, A., Koulle, K and Bhimnan, N. (2019) ‘Special collections as a catalyst for flexible pedagogical approaches: three case studies’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 16, pp.1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i16.549

Marsh, K., Richardson, M. and Schmidt, R. (2009) ‘Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination’. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), pp.320–339. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25164936/

Newton, A. (2024) ‘Playful learning with objects and why it matters’, Teaching with objects. Available at: https://teachingwithobjects.org/articles/playful-learning-with-objects-and-why-it-matters (Accessed 22 May 2025).

PBS NewsHour. (2018) David Hockney thinks you should take a longer look at life. 14 April. Available at: https://youtu.be/P2vPPviP9B8?si=JFZZUY5iJHxy3npP (Accessed: 15 April 2025).

Piaget, J. (1973) The child’s conception of the world. London: Paladin.

Playful Learning Association (2025) https://playfullearningassoc.co.uk/ (Accessed: 22 September 2025).

Project Zero. (2025) ‘See, think, wonder’, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Available at: https://pz.harvard.edu/resources/see-think-wonder (Accessed: 22 September 2025).

Ryan, R., and Deci, E. (2000) ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being', The American Psychologist, 55(1), pp.68–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. and Knoblich,G. (2006) ‘Joint action: bodies and minds moving together’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), pp.70–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009

Tishman, S. (2018) Slow looking: the art and practice of learning through observation. New York: Routledge.

UCL. (n.d.) Object based learning. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-collections/working-our-collections/object-based-learning-laboratory/object-based-learning (Accessed: 17 November 2025).

University of Leeds. (2025) Thinking with objects. Available at: https://baumaninstitute.leeds.ac.uk/thinking-with-objects/ (Accessed:15 September 2025).

van der Sluis, H. (2020) ‘Slow higher education’, New Vistas, 6(1), pp.4–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36828/newvistas.105

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Woodall, A. (2019) ‘On object dialogue boxes: silence, empathy and unknowing’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(1). pp.96–111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1428665

Yeo, M.M.L., Miller-Young, J. and Manarin, K. (2024) SoTL research methodologies: a guide to conceptualizing and conducting the scholarship of teaching and learning. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

11-12-2025

How to Cite

Newton, A. (2025). Student perceptions of object-based learning. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (38). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi38.1619

Issue

No. 38 (2025)

Section

Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).