Step away from the paraphrase: teaching note-taking as a gateway to knowledge transformation

Authors

  • Zephra Weber Oxford Brookes University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi32.1460

Keywords:

reading-to-write, student notetaking practices, student writing beliefs, reading skills, teaching paraphrasing

Abstract

In this presentation, we examined the role note-taking can play as a gateway to knowledge transformation in the reading-to-write process and challenged an academic focus on the teaching of paraphrasing. Much research has been done into the role that note-taking plays in lectures (Morehead et al., 2019), the impact of longhand notes compared with digital (Allen et al., 2020) and student writing strategies (Wingate and Harper, 2021). Although notes play an important role in evidence-based writing, in both providing a clear record of a student’s reading and increasing encoding and engagement (Voyer et al., 2022), very little research directly addresses the impact of note-taking strategies in the reading-to-write process. This study builds on work done in educational psychology by Cuevas et al. (2016) examining writing beliefs. It aims to understand student approaches to evidence gathering and explore links between their current practices and their writing beliefs.

Understanding current student practices and the link with epistemological beliefs will allow us, as learning developers, to more effectively create targeted activities and interventions to support student understanding and engagement with texts in the reading-to-write process. It will also provide a foundation for explicit discussion and reflection of student beliefs about the nature of reading and writing and the link between these beliefs and note-taking practices, encouraging students to see reading and writing as knowledge construction and, importantly, encouraging deeper cognitive engagement and learning.

 

The study builds on work done in educational psychology by Cuevas et al. (2016) examining the link between writing beliefs and students’ ability to create argumentation and synthesis and attempts to answer the questions: (1) In the reading-to-write process, what common strategies are students using to record information from their reading? (2) What potential impacts do common practices have on learning, focus, source integration and academic integrity? (3) How are students’ epistemological beliefs about reading and writing reflected in their notetaking practices? (4) How do common practices impact students’ ability to transform knowledge and incorporate it into existing beliefs?

 

Understanding current student practices and the link with epistemological beliefs will allow us, as learning developers, to more effectively create targeted activities and interventions to support student understanding and engagement with texts in the reading-to-write process. It will also provide a foundation for explicit discussion and reflection of student beliefs about the nature of reading and writing and the link between these beliefs and notetaking practices, encouraging students to see reading and writing as knowledge construction and, importantly, encouraging deeper cognitive engagement and learning.

Author Biography

Zephra Weber, Oxford Brookes University

Zephra Weber is a lecturer in Academic Language and Literacies for the Centre for Academic Development at Oxford Brookes University. She has a background in learning development and English language teaching.

References

Allen, M., LeFebvre, L., LeFebvre, L. and Bourhis, J. (2020) ‘Is the pencil mightier than the keyboard? A meta-analysis comparing the method of notetaking outcomes’, Southern Communication Journal, 85(3), pp.143-154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2020.1764613

Cuevas, I., Mateos, M., Martín, E., Luna, M., Martín, A., Solari, M., González-Lamaz, J. and Martínez, I. (2016) ‘Collaborative writing of argumentative syntheses from multiple sources: the role of writing beliefs and strategies in addressing controversy’, Journal of Writing Research, 8(2), pp.205-226. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.02

Igo, L.B., Bruning, R. and McCrudden, M.T. (2005) ‘Exploring differences in students’ copy-and-paste decision making and processing: a mixed-methods study’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), pp.103-116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.103

Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Blasiman, R. and Hollis, R.B. (2019) ‘Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: implications for student learning, memory, and achievement’, Memory, 27(6), pp.807-819. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694

Voyer, D., Ronis, S.T. and Byers, N. (2022) ‘The effect of notetaking method on academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, pp.1-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102025

Wingate, U. and Harper, R. (2021) ‘Completing the first assignment: a case study of the writing processes of a successful and an unsuccessful student’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, pp.1-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100948

Downloads

Published

31-10-2024

How to Cite

Weber, Z. (2024) “Step away from the paraphrase: teaching note-taking as a gateway to knowledge transformation”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (32). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi32.1460.