I'm a chatbot, ask me anything: using ChatGPT to improve learning experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi32.1414Keywords:
GenAI, cognitive load, skill building, artificial intelligence, AIAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers substantial opportunities and challenges in higher education. Given the evolving technological landscape, educators must ensure that students acquire a skill set encompassing both AI and traditional academic skills to enable them to succeed in their studies and future careers. We tested two groups of students, who each watched a recorded lecture on an unfamiliar topic. The first group used ChatGPT to ask questions and clarify content during the lecture, while the second group used Google search for the same purpose. We assessed the impact of these tools on the students’ cognitive load (germane and extraneous) and measured active learning through the number of questions students asked. We also used a post-test quiz, covering the breadth of Bloom’s Taxonomy, to evaluate the efficacy of each method. We expected that students using ChatGPT would experience lower extraneous cognitive load, higher germane cognitive load, and would learn content more effectively. Qualitative results demonstrated a notable preference for chatbots over search engines, due to the ease of locating specific information and obtaining insightful responses. Our findings suggest the potential of AI as a transformative tool in education, helping to enhance and deepen learning, while ensuring students retain ownership of their critical and creative processes. Leveraging the potential of AI and large language models may also serve a broader purpose: by personalising learning experiences to match individual students’ language skills, experience levels, and needs, AI may bridge the gap between the tailored support students want and the practical constraints that educators face.
References
Bobula, M. (2004) ‘Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: a comprehensive review of challenges, opportunities, and implications’, Journal of Learning Development, Issue 30, March, pp.1-27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1137.
Papert, S. (1980) Mindstroms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/1095592.
Vasconcelos, M. A. R. and dos Santos, R. P. (2023) ‘Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: a case study’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 19(7), pp.1-15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313.
Zhou, X. and Schofield, L. (2024) ‘Using social learning theories to explore the role of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in collaborative learning’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Issue 30, March, pp.1-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1031.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).