Tackling difficult changes in digital education through playful learning and gamification: the case of generative AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi35.1334Keywords:
generative AI, AI literacy, playful learning, gamificationAbstract
We have been using approaches drawn from gamification and playful learning theories to create spaces for colleagues to explore generative AI (GenAI) in a way which is naturally fun. We have developed several games and activities to stimulate the sense of experimentation and creativity that many of us used when encountering new technology in childhood. We want to make a case that, although reflecting on the ethical and philosophical preoccupations that prey on our adult minds is important, so is treating GenAI as a new toy we can break out of the box and mess around with.
We will share some examples of activities we have used within the King’s community, from our Chatbot Bingo! Icebreaker activity that encourages people to start talking about their own experience of AI to our GenAI Challenge, where we ask people to use GenAI to create images, poetry etc. and then discuss the capabilities and limits of GenAI tools. We reflect on our experiences of using these to create a culture that is open to the opportunity for change that GenAI represents. This is a moment when many of us are waiting to see what happens, waiting for experts to tell us the best way forward. Our playful approach does not seek to tell colleagues the best way forward, instead our goal is to inspire them to stop waiting and start moving forward themselves.
References
Brown, N. and Collins, J. (2018) ‘Using LEGO® to understand emotion work in doctoral education’, International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4), pp. 193–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.54.18-014
Budhathoki, T., Zirar, A., Njoya, E.T. and Timsina, A. (2024) ‘ChatGPT adoption and anxiety: a cross-country analysis utilising the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT)’, Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), pp. 831–846. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2333937
Chan, C.K.Y. and Lee, K.K.W. (2023) ‘The AI generation gap: are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?’, Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), p. 60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Davis, F.D. (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Freeman, J. (2024) Provide or punish? Students’ views on generative AI in higher education. HEPI Policy Note 51. Oxford: HEPI. Available at: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HEPI-Policy-Note-51.pdf (Accessed: 22 October 2024).
Holbert, R.M.G. (2015) ‘Beginning with Bingo – an icebreaker to initiate classroom community’, College Teaching [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1052723
Jackson, C. (2010) ‘Fear in education’, Educational Review, 62(1), pp. 39–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910903469544
Trudeau, J. (2018) Justin Trudeau’s Davos address in full. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/pm-keynote-remarks-for-world-economic-forum-2018/ (Accessed: 25 October 2024).
La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I. and Chiappetta, M. (2019) ‘Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review’, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(1), pp. 13–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
Li, L. and Wang, X. (2021) ‘Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education’, Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(2), pp. 315–330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0
Lim, W.M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J.L., Pallant, J.I. and Pechenkina, E. (2023) ‘Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators’, The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), p.100790. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
Pedregosa-Fauste, S., Tejero-Vidal, L.L., García-Díaz, F. and Martínez-Rodríguez, L. (2024) ‘Using LEGO® Serious Play for students’ critical-reflective reasoning development in the construction of the nursing metaparadigm’, Nurse Education Today, 134, p.106104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106104
Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition. New York, NY: Free Press.
Stott, A. and Neustaedter, C. (2013) Analysis of gamification in education. Simon Fraser University. Available at: http://clab.iat.sfu.ca/pubs/Stott-Gamification.pdf (Accessed: 4 March 2025).
Tyng, C.M., Amin, H.U., Saad, M.N.M. and Malik, A.S. (2017) ‘The Influences of emotion on learning and memory’, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, p.1454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Walsh, A. (2019) ‘Giving permission for adults to play’, The Journal of Play in Adulthood, 1(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5920/jpa.565
Weisskirch, R.S. (2009) ‘Playing Bingo to review fundamental concepts in advanced courses’, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030114
Whitton, N. (2018) ‘Playful learning: tools, techniques, and tactics’, Research in Learning Technology, 26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2035
Whitton, N. (2022) ‘The playful educator’, in N. Whitton (ed.) Play and learning in adulthood: reimagining pedagogy and the politics of education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 125–157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13975-8_5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).