‘I would say the mark itself, it doesn't tell the whole story’: the student view of what success means
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi35.1308Keywords:
student success, joy of learning, higher educationAbstract
This paper presents and discusses the findings of a research study that aimed to investigate how undergraduate Business students measure the success of their own learning. The setting was a post-1992 university in the North-West of England. Higher education institutions and government policy can appear fixated on student success as a quantifiable outcome of an undergraduate degree course; it is something that can be measured via the grading system. As such, the meaning of student success can appear to be straightforward; however, this paper sets out to question this assumption. The findings of the study show that how students thought lecturers measured success was markedly different from how they talked about measuring their own success. They viewed lecturers as being focused on things that could be measured, such as grades. How the participants talked about their own success was far more nuanced and it focused on emotion in addition to grades. For the participants, success meant proving something to themselves and the enjoyment of having learnt something new. Another notable finding was that the participants wanted to feel they had earned their success through challenge and hard work. The contribution this study makes to knowledge is to add to a small and important body of work on how undergraduate students view success. It challenges the normalised identity of an undergraduate Business student as being grade-focused and, in doing so, argues that an understanding of the enjoyment of learning and the sense of personal satisfaction that academic achievement can bring adds a much-needed richness to a student-centred understanding of what success in HE means.
References
Ajjawi, R., Dracup, M. and Boud, D. (2021) ‘Hero, survivor or stuck: a narrative analysis of student constructions of persistence after failure’, Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), pp. 1–151-15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1952569
Allen, K. (2020) ‘“When does hot become cold?”: why we should be disrupting narrow and exclusive discourses of success in higher education’, International Studies in Widening Participation, 7(1), pp. 8-21. Available at: https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/143 (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Anderson, L., Hibbert, P., Mason, K. and Rivers, C. (2018) ‘Management education in turbulent times’. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), pp. 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918779421
Archibald, M.M., Ambagtsheer, R.C., Casey, M.G. and Lawless, M. (2019) ‘Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, pp. 1-8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Ashwin, P. (2020) Transforming university education: a manifesto. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Barnett, R. (2009) ‘Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum’, Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), pp. 429-440. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771978
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77-101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2013) Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2022) Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: SAGE.
Bunce, L., Baird, A. and Jones, S. E. (2017) ‘The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance’, Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), pp. 1958-1978. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
Cachia, M., Lynam, S. and Stock, R. (2018) ‘Academic success: Is it just about the grades?’, Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), pp.434-439. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462096
Calma, A. and Dickson-Deane, C. (2020) ‘The student as customer and quality in higher education’, International Journal of Educational Management. 34 (8) pp. 1221-1235 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2019-0093
Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2021) National Student Survey 2021: Results for Business & Management Studies. Available at: https://charteredabs.org/policy/research/national-student-survey-2021-results-for-business-management-studies (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Clack, J. (2022) ‘Can we fix education? Living emancipatory pedagogy in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education, 27(2), pp. 141-154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1704724
Coates, H. and Matthews, K.E. (2018) ‘Frontier perspectives and insights into higher education student success’, Higher Education Research & Development, 37(5), pp. 903-907. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1474539
Crotty, M. (1998) The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London: SAGE.
Dean, A., Shubita, M. and Claxton, J. (2020) ‘What type of learning journey do students value most? Understanding enduring factors from the NSS leading to responsible decision-making’, Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(4), pp. 347-362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2020-0017
Delahunty, J. and O’Shea, S. (2021) ‘“Don’t let anyone bring me down again”: applying “possible selves” to understanding persistence of mature-age first-in-family students’, Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 461-475. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1771682
Finn, K., Ingram, N. and Allen, K. (2021) ‘Student millennials/millennial students’, in R. Brooks and S. O’Shea (eds.) Reimagining the higher education student. New York: Routledge.
Halpern, N. (2007) ‘The impact of attendance and student characteristics on academic achievement: findings from an undergraduate business management module’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), pp. 335-349. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701626017
Heaton, J. (2022) ‘“*Pseudonyms are used throughout”: a footnote, unpacked’, Qualitative Inquiry, 28(1), pp.123–132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211048379
Hesse-Biber, S.N. and Leavy, P. (2011) The practice of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
Hibbert, P. (2016) Undergraduate retention and attainment in Business and Management. Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/undergraduate-retention-and-attainment-business-and-management (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Higher Education Academy (2016) Enhancing student success in higher education. York: HEA. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-05/Enhancing%20Student%20Success%20in%20Higher%20Education%20Framework.pdf (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Higher Education Statistics Agency (2022) Higher Education Student Statistics: UK, 2020/21 - Subjects studied. Available at: https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/25-01-2022/sb262-higher-education-student-statistics/subjects (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
hooks, b. (2010) Teaching critical thinking: practical wisdom. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869192
Humberstone, B., Beard, C. and Clayton, B. (2013) ‘Performativity and enjoyable learning’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(2), pp. 280-295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.645452
Koris, R. and Aav, S. (2019) ‘There is more to us than meets the eye: a glimpse into how business school graduates view their purpose’, International Journal of Management Education, 17(2), pp. 151-161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.02.001
Leathwood, C. and O'Connell, P. (2003) ‘“It's a struggle”: the construction of the “new student’” in higher education’, Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), pp. 597-615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000145863
Myers, J. (2008) ‘Is personal tutoring sustainable? Comparing the trajectory of the personal tutor with that of the residential warden’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 607-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334988
Nixon, E., Scullion, R. and Hearn, R. (2018) ‘Her majesty the student: marketised higher education and the narcissistic (dis)satisfactions of the student-consumer’, Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), pp. 927-943. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196353
Nyström, A-S., Jackson, C. and Salminen Karlsson, M. (2019) ‘What counts as success? Constructions of achievement in prestigious higher education programmes’, Research Papers in Education, 34(4), pp. 465-482. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452964
O'Shea, S. and Delahunty, J. (2018) ‘Getting through the day and still having a smile on my face! How do students define success in the university learning environment?’, Higher Education Research & Development, 37(5), pp.1062-1075. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1463973
Parker, M. (2018) Shut down the Business School: what's wrong with management education. London: Pluto Press.
Patrick, H. and Middleton, M.J. (2002) ‘Turning the kaleidoscope: what we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens’, Educational Psychologist, 37(1), pp. 27-39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_4
Picton, C., Kahu, E.R. and Nelson, K. (2018) ‘“Hardworking, determined and happy”: first-year students’ understanding and experience of success’, Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), pp. 1260-1273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1478803
Read, B., Archer, L. and Leathwood, C. (2003) ‘Challenging cultures? Student conceptions of “belonging” and “isolation” at a post-1992 university’, Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), pp. 261-277. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309290
Reay, D., Crozier, G. and Clayton, J. (2010) ‘“Fitting in” or “standing out”: working‐class students in UK higher education”, British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), pp. 107-124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878925
Roulston, K. and Choi, M. (2018) ‘Qualitative interviews’, in U. Flick (ed.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. London: SAGE Publications.
Sá, M.J. (2020) ‘“The secret to success”. Becoming a successful student in a fast-changing higher education environment’, European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), pp. 420-435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1777445
Stoten, D.W. (2018) ‘Employability: a contested concept in higher education’, Journal of pedagogic development, 8(1). Available at: https://uobrep.openrepository.com/handle/10547/622552 (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Sykes, G. (2021) ‘Dispelling the myth of the “traditional” undergraduate student in the UK’, in R. Brooks and S. O’Shea (eds.) Reimagining the higher education student. Abingdon: Routledge.
The British Academy (2021) Business and management provision in UK higher education. Available at: https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/business-and-management-provision-in-uk-higher-education/ (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Thomson, P. (2020) Reading against the literatures. Available at: https://patthomson.net/2020/06/15/reading-against-the-literatures-litreview/ (Accessed: 12 March 2025).
Wong, B. and Chiu, Y-L.T. (2019) ‘“Swallow your pride and fear”: the educational strategies of high-achieving non-traditional university students’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(7), 868-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1604209
Yorke, M. (2004) Retention and student success in higher education. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).