The importance of imagining otherwise: exploring the antenarrative generation of change ideas through an appreciative approach to professional learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi35.1305Keywords:
appreciative inquiry, generative inquiry, professional learning, imagination, antenarrativeAbstract
Imagining towards a different-to-now future is an essential ingredient of institutional change, yet is often downplayed in the neo-liberal university, where current statistical data drives pedagogies of efficiency (Ball, 2016). We challenge readers to consider the role of imagining in academia, not as a fanciful flight of extraordinary thinking, but as a vital element of practice inquiry (Zandee, 2013). Appreciative Inquiry (Cooperrider et al., 2008) is underpinned by collective storytelling and imagining, to generate possibilities from what already exists and works well, thereby challenging problem-only focused forms of scholarship. During four Appreciative Inquiry workshops in a large online institution, Associate Lecturers (tutors) immersed themselves in their own stories of practice and encountered stories created through Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) projects undertaken by others. Through inquiring into these different stories, we identified aspects of tuition that generated imaginings towards a different pedagogical future. Using Boje’s (2001; 2011) notion of antenarrative, we explore how story fragments from the workshops were relationally produced and set in motion, challenging notions of practice stories as being static elements in scholarship writing, and as ‘servicing’ linear forms of scholarship which focus on ‘quick win’ solution finding (Saunders and Cooke, forthcoming). We argue that practices of imagining are key to liberating staff to be collectively agentic in generating change. We contend that an appreciative approach creates the space-time to experiment with what might be, repositioning practice stories and imagining in professional learning, leading towards a more generative space for change in higher education.
References
Abegglen, S., Kamal, S., Burns, T., Akhbari, M. and Sinfield, S. (2023) ‘(Re)Imagining higher education: an inspirational guide for academics’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Issue 29, October, pp.1-8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi29.1099
Ball, S. J. (2016) ‘Neoliberal education: confronting the slouching beast’, Policy Futures in Education, 14(8), pp.1046-1059. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259
Boje, D. (2001) Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
Boje, D. (2011) ‘Introduction to agential narratives that shape the future of organisations’, in D. Boje (ed.) Storytelling and the future of organisations: an antenarrative handbook. Routledge. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/Storytelling-and-the-Future-of-Organizations-An-Antenarrative-Handbook/Boje/p/book/9781138959699?srsltid=AfmBOoqXvpt8OlUd3uVPS1BiqpTYfdQPK2cdMC0jvLYPzldwBxjTVNac (Accessed: 4 June 2024).
Bushe, G. R. (2007) ‘Appreciative Inquiry is not (just) about the positive’, OD Practitioner, 39(4), pp.30-35.
Cockell, J. and McArthur-Blair, J. (2020) Appreciative Inquiry in higher education: a transformative force. Victoria: Friesen Press.
Cooke, C. and Saunders, C. (2023) An appreciative approach to inquiry. Available at: https://www.open.edu/openlearn/education-development/learning/an-appreciative-approach-inquiry/content-section-overview?active-tab=description-tab (Accessed: 4 June 2024).
Cooperrider, D. L., Stavros, J. M. and Whitney, D. (2008) The appreciative inquiry handbook: for leaders of change. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. L. (1987) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Translated from the French by B. Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dey, P. and Mason, C. (2018) ‘Overcoming constraints of collective imagination: an inquiry into activist entrepreneuring, disruptive truth-telling and the creation of “possible worlds”’. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), pp.84-99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.002
Ghaye, T., Melander-Wikman, A., Kisare, M., Chambers, P., Bergmark, U., Kostenius, C. and Lillyman, S. (2008) ‘Participatory and appreciative action and reflection (PAAR) – democratizing reflective practices’, Reflective Practice, 9(4), pp.361-397. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802475827
Grant, S. and Humphries, M. (2006) ‘Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: bridging an apparent paradox’, Action Research, 4(4), pp.401-418. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306070103
Greene, M. (1995) Releasing the imagination: essays on education, the arts, and social change. London: Jossey-Bass.
Johnstone, K. (1987) Impro: improvisation and the theatre. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jørgensen, K. M., Klee, N. and Canal, M. (2014) ‘The multivoiced classroom: a storytelling ethics approach to management education’, in K. M. Jørgensen and C. Largarcha-Martinez (eds) New York, NY: Nova Scientific Publisher, pp.177-196.
Koenig Kellas, J. (2008) ‘Narrative theories: making sense of interpersonal communication’, in L. A. Baxter and D. O. Braithwaite (eds) Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.241-254.
Lönngren, J. and van Poeck, K. (2020) ‘Wicked problems: a mapping review of the literature’, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), pp.481-502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1859415
Love, B. (2020) We want to do more than survive: abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. London: Penguin Random House.
Moravec, J. (2012) Knowmad Society. Education Futures. Available at: KnowmadSociety.pdf (educationfutures.com) (Accessed 20 September 2024).
Moxnes, A. R. and Osgood, J. (2018) ‘Sticky stories from the classroom: from reflection to diffraction in early childhood teacher education’, Contemporary issues in early childhood, 19(3), pp.297-309. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118766662
Riessman, C. K. (2008) Narrative methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
Schwittay, A. (2022) ‘Imagining alternative futures’, LSE Higher Education Blog, 28 July. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2022/07/28/imagining-alternative-futures/ (Accessed: 4 June 2024).
Watkins, J. M., Mohr, B. J. and Ralph, K. (2011) Appreciative inquiry: change at the speed of imagination. 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
von Wright, M. (2021) ‘Imagination and education’, Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1-16. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1487 (Accessed: 4 June 2024).
Zandee, D. P. (2013) ‘The process of generative inquiry’, Organizational generativity: the appreciative inquiry summit and a scholarship of transformation, 4, pp.69-88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9152(2013)0000004002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).