Ways of rethinking inclusion for disabled students in Higher Education

Authors

  • Julian Ingle University of Portsmouth

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi29.1096

Keywords:

inclusion, Disability, social justice, invisibility, minoritised, exclusion

Abstract

The word ‘inclusion’ now frequently appears in the marketing strategies of many UK universities, despite the equivocal ways the term is used across the sector (Koutsouris et al., 2022). For some of us in the field of disability studies, these ambiguities in the ways the concept of inclusion is used are one of the reasons why it has become emptied of meaning. While notionally disclosing the invisible work entailed in being disabled (Wertans and Burch, 2022), inclusion also implies a form of privileging: those on the inside determine who is included and on what grounds. This assimilationist discourse reproduces the socio-political structures and practices that categorise those who are outsiders (Biesta 2010; Biesta, 2019). Moreover, the technocratic nature of the current political context in which performance and its measurement are the main drivers of how higher education (HE) is required to address underrepresented groups and their performance (Peters, 2020; Supiot, 2021), for example, through access and participation plans, not only homogenises disability but inevitably excludes others (Evans and Zhu, 2022). For example, this may happen to postgraduate students, international students or those who, because of the discrimination and stigma they experience, choose not to disclose a disability. This presentation explored the problematic nature of inclusion in relation to disabled students in HE and how it might impact on the work of learning developers. The paper explored Biesta’s concept of ‘transclusion’ as a way of transforming and rethinking how we conceptualise and enact equality of access, participation and social justice and what this could mean for practitioners. It highlighted the extent to which we, as practitioners, could contest and respond to the complex demands of inclusion in ways that might help change institutional cultures and thinking about disability so that disabled students (and staff) remain less invisible.

Author Biography

Julian Ingle, University of Portsmouth

Julian Ingle currently works in Academic Development at the University of Portsmouth. Prior to this, he was part of the internationally renowned Thinking Writing team at Queen Mary University of London. He worked at a number of London universities and then joined the University of Portsmouth as head of section of the Academic Skills Unit. Among other areas, he has published and presented on teaching disciplinary discourse and writing, research-based learning, and how policy and practices impact on minoritised groups in higher education. His current research interests include critical discourse analysis, disability studies and gender identity.

References

Biesta, G.J.J. (2010) Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.

Biesta, G.J.J (2019) Obstinate Education: Reconnecting school and society. Brill-Sense

Evans, C., and Zhu, X with Easte, C. (2022) The Disability Inclusion Institutional Framework (International). University of Lincoln, UK, University of Southampton, UK. https://inclusiveheorg.files.wordpress.com/2022/08/disability_inclusion_institutional_framework_international_2022-2.pdf (Accessed: 8 October 2023)

Koutsouris, G., Stentiford, L., and Norwich, B. (2022) ‘A critical exploration of inclusion policies of elite UK universities’, British Educational Research Journal, 48, pp. 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3799

Peters, M. (2020) ‘An educational theory of innovation: What constitutes the educational good?’ Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(10), pp. 1016-1022. https://doi.org: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1699992

Selwyn, N. (2022) ‘Approaching education from the inside out (an interview with Gert Biesta)’, Critical Studies of Education & Technology. Available from: https://criticaledtech.com/2022/01/11/approaching-education-from-the-inside-out-an-interview-with-gert-biesta/ (Accessed: 25 August 2023).

Supiot, A. (2021) ‘Foucault’s Mistake: Biopolitics, Scientism and the Rule of Law’, New Left Review, 132, pp. 125-139.

Wertans, E. and Burch, L. (2022) ‘“It’s Backdoor Accessibility”: Disabled Students’ Navigation of University Campus’, Journal of Disability Research in Education, 3(1), pp. 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888803-bja10013

Williams, D. (1996) Autism: An Inside-Out Approach: An Innovative Look at the 'Mechanics' of 'Autism' and its Developmental 'Cousins'. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Downloads

Published

31-10-2023

How to Cite

Ingle, J. (2023) “Ways of rethinking inclusion for disabled students in Higher Education”, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (29). doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi29.1096.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.